Discussion:
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] uptone audio regen
SBGK
2015-05-22 12:10:54 UTC
Permalink
http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen

What do my learned friends make of the claims made about this product ?


Should have you all choking on your cornflakes. lol



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Man in a van
2015-05-22 15:02:22 UTC
Permalink
SBGK wrote:
> http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen
>
> What do my learned friends make of the claims made about this product ?
>
> Should have you all choking on your cornflakes. lol




As a non learned, non aquainted and frankly not bothered too much about
the opinion of others unless they are based on their experience, I
would say they are as valid as any claims made in that blog that is in
your signature.

It might have been better if your question had been phrased in a manner
that does not suggest you are trolling.

YMMV :p

Ronnie.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-22 15:10:20 UTC
Permalink
it does not have any tubes in it :P why is there no tube driven USB
outputs , this cant be good ;) cheers



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
bonze
2015-05-22 17:29:11 UTC
Permalink
Good grief! Is it that time of the year already?



LMS Version: 7.9
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - WHS 2011
2x Touch, 3x SB3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
bonze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6150
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
adyc
2015-05-23 00:36:45 UTC
Permalink
It is designed by John Swenson. He used it with great effect with his
Touch. Don't dismiss it easily. I have one and it certainly works.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
adyc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12564
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-23 03:09:17 UTC
Permalink
adyc wrote:
> It is designed by John Swenson. He used it with great effect with his
> Touch. Don't dismiss it easily. I have one and it certainly works.

It is not the typical hawking of $1,000/meter cables or claims of that
ilk. I'm not edumacated enough to know if John's theories, as he's put
into practice, are sound science. But my lay read of his explanations
would suggest that there's some merit here.

http://uptoneaudio.com/pages/j-swenson-tech-corner

It would appear to me that this REGEN device is contributing to reducing
some kind of analog noise that almost any USB dac would produce,
internally. Not that it validates anything, but there sure seem to be
an awful lot of folks who are liking the little gadget...and at $175 it
wouldn't appear that John and Alex are trying to rip people off
price-wise, either.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Archimago
2015-05-23 14:58:01 UTC
Permalink
Hey I'd love to try it out and compare to whether it reduces the 8kHz
USB packet noise I reduced with the Corning optical USB a few weeks back
in the blog post.

Anyone in Vancouver with one for me to borrow :-)?



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-24 03:44:06 UTC
Permalink
Archimago wrote:
> Hey I'd love to try it out and compare to whether it reduces the 8kHz
> USB packet noise I reduced with the Corning optical USB a few weeks back
> in the blog post.
>
> Anyone in Vancouver with one for me to borrow :-)?

That was interesting that you have a case where this kind of noise
creeps trough the dac.

The surprising thing for me is that the DAC is not agnostic to this ?
Seems like a design error to me ?

There is probaly real use cases where this kind of product solves a real
problem . But it's not typically how its marketed and sold ,



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-24 05:48:25 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> That was interesting that you have a case where this kind of noise
> creeps trough the dac.
>
> The surprising thing for me is that the DAC is not agnostic to this ?
> Seems like a design error to me ?
>
> There is probaly real use cases where this kind of product solves a real
> problem . But it's not typically how its marketed and sold ,

If you think John's explanation that I referenced has some truth, then
it would appear that most, if not all, USB dacs produce some level of
internal noise from their USB processing chips. And, I suspect many of
us would be, or are, surprised at this.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-24 05:55:29 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> If you think John's explanation that I referenced has some truth, then
> it would appear that most, if not all, USB dacs produce some level of
> internal noise from their USB processing chips. And, I suspect many of
> us would be, or are, surprised at this.

There is always something I assume , but from archimagos blog you can
see a case where it's also an audible problem .

My initial jokes where ( as usual ) aimed at the typical magic bullet
thinking , must buyers of this product may not have an audible noise
problem but will have their veils lifted and blacker blacks between the
notes etc



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 10:20:59 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> There is always something I assume , but from archimagos blog you can
> see a case where it's also an audible problem .
>

I see a measurable problem, but the audible part is not nearly as clear.
Am I missing something?

Good rule of thumb is that anything that is > 100 dB down is intensely
difficult or impossible to hear in any reasonable application. Oh maybe
you can come up with some insane setting of a gain control some place,
but back in the real world...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-24 12:15:09 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I see a measurable problem, but the audible part is not nearly as clear.
> Am I missing something?
>
> Good rule of thumb is that anything that is > 100 dB down is intensely
> difficult or impossible to hear in any reasonable application. Oh maybe
> you can come up with some insane setting of a gain control some place,
> but back in the real world...

If you read archimagos blog , it is some kind of weird gain problem a HT
bypass mode in his preamp and probably some other design issue .

Having good gain scaling in a system makes a lot difference , to much
gain everywhere is very common . Yes if its 100dB down you wont hear it
I agree, its often less . In most system you never hear -100dB signal
sitting in the listening position with your usual volume even if its the
signal alone unmasked by music



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 12:47:07 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> If you read archimagos blog , it is some kind of weird gain problem a HT
> bypass mode in his preamp and probably some other design issue .
>

Its incidence (but not severity) is inherent in high speed USB:

Following a link in archimagos blog about the Corning Optical Isolator
(which is in its way for real):

[URL="http://www.usbmadesimple.co.uk/ums_6.htm"Usb made simple "Frames
and Microframes"[/URL]

"
Frames and Microframes

The 1 ms frame rate in full speed / low speed USB, is used for a number
of purposes, such as scheduling access to the bus, and as a timing
reference for interrupt and isochronous transfers.

For high speed, a higher frame rate was deemed appropriate, while still
maintaining a relationship with the existing 1 kHz rate.

To this end, high speed uses the 'Microframe' which is 125us long (8
Microframes per millisecond). The correspondence with the 1ms frame
numbering is maintained in the high speed SOF packets by repeating each
frame number in 8 successive Microframes.
"

>
> Having good gain scaling in a system makes a lot difference , to much
> gain everywhere is very common . Yes if its 100dB down you wont hear it
> I agree, its often less . In most system you never hear -100dB signal
> sitting in the listening position with your usual volume even if its the
> signal alone unmasked by music

In the Blog the actual level was:

18104

A little higher than -100 dB, but not much. This is IME a very
implementation-dependent number. You can get good performance here
without add-ons if you have the right gear and a clean setup.


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: 8kHz_USB2.png |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=18104|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
ralphpnj
2015-05-24 13:45:33 UTC
Permalink
The SB Touch has both optical and coax digital outputs and many
computers (like the one I use) have either an optical or coax digital
output along with the USB output. Therefore I use any of these non-USB
outputs to feed my DAC. The cost, aside from the cable, is ZERO.



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 14:01:11 UTC
Permalink
Seems to me that this is FFT basics 101 - interpreting the "grass" seen
on an FFT as the noisefloor - in this case -140dB

Have a read of this document in order to understand
http://www.ni.com/white-paper/4278/en/
"Computing Noise Level and Power Spectral Density
The measurement of noise levels depends on the bandwidth of the
measurement. When looking at the noise floor of a power spectrum, you
are looking at the narrowband noise level in each FFT bin. Thus, the
noise floor of a given power spectrum depends on the f of the spectrum,
which is in turn controlled by the sampling rate and number of points.
In other words, the noise level at each frequency line reads as if it
were measured through a f Hz filter centered at that frequency line.
Therefore, for a given sampling rate, doubling the number of points
acquired reduces the noise power that appears in each bin by 3 dB.
Discrete frequency components theoretically have zero bandwidth and
therefore do not scale with the number of points or frequency range of
the FFT."

What is being shown in the graph is "narrowband noise level in each FFT
bin." not the noise floor although the noise floor can be calculated
from it given some background information.

As to the Regen - it has a good theoretical explanation from John
Swenson - the increased electrical noise generated within the USB Phy in
handling USB signals with reduced signal integrity. This Regen device
seems to address this issue by moving the electrical noise problem off
the main USB DAC board into a separate USB hub device. The advantage
being that this is USB hub is independently powered & therefore
electrical noise can be treated independent to the USB DAC. It then
generates a new USB signal with presumably better signal integrity which
is meant to be located at the input to the USB DAC.

This electrical noise is not quite the same as the 8KHz spike seen in
ARchimago's graph which is directly related to 8kHz "packet noise".
Archimago's graph, however, does show how electrical noise from internal
chip activity can make it to the output.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-24 14:11:22 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Seems to me that this is FFT basics 101 - incorrectly interpreting the
> "grass" seen on an FFT as the "noisefloor" - in Archimago's graph
> -140dB
>
> Have a read of this document in order to understand
> http://www.ni.com/white-paper/4278/en/
>
>
> What is being shown in the graph is "narrowband noise level in each FFT
> bin." not the noise floor although the noise floor can be calculated
> from it given some background information.
>
> As to the Regen - it has a good theoretical explanation from John
> Swenson - the increased electrical noise generated within the USB Phy in
> handling USB signals with reduced signal integrity. This Regen device
> seems to address this issue by moving the electrical noise problem off
> the main USB DAC board into a separate USB hub device. The advantage
> being that this is USB hub is independently powered & therefore
> electrical noise can be treated independent to the USB DAC. It then
> generates a new USB signal with presumably better signal integrity which
> is meant to be located at the input to the USB DAC.
>
> This electrical noise spoken of by John Swenson & which this device
> addresses is not quite the same as the 8KHz spike seen in ARchimago's
> graph which is directly related to 8kHz "packet noise". Archimago's
> graph, however, does illustrate how internal chip activity creates
> electrical noise which can make it to the output.

Thanks jkeny, a much better explanation than my lame attempt!



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 16:01:47 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> Thanks jkeny, a much better explanation than my lame attempt!

Thanks but be aware, if this thread follows the usual trend, you are
next going to be asked to "prove" that it is audibly better by doing a
blind test :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-24 16:19:01 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Thanks but be aware, if this thread follows the usual trend, you are
> next going to be asked to "prove" that it is audibly better by doing a
> blind test :)
>
> The whiff of this is already evident from the measurists "if it's 100dB
> down, more or less, its probably not going to an audible problem"

Heh...well, I don't have one, so that'll be impossible. Notwithstanding
SBGK's usual amusing chippiness, when I took the time to look into it,
it sounded like a device that actually had the feel of something based
on some good engineering. Plus JS had been a fairly well-respected
contributor here until whatever untoward events caused him and Triode to
bail. The dac he'd been talking about developing had raised some
excitement around this forum, too. So, with that all in mind I remain
interested to hear what other folks think of this REGEN.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 16:22:09 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> Heh...well, I don't have one, so that'll be impossible. Notwithstanding
> SBGK's usual amusing chippiness, when I took the time to look into it,
> it sounded like a device that actually had the feel of something based
> on some good engineering. Plus JS had been a fairly well-respected
> contributor here until whatever untoward events caused him and Triode to
> bail. The dac he'd been talking about developing had raised some
> excitement around this forum, too. So, with that all in mind I remain
> interested to hear what other folks think of this REGEN.

Sure, I already edited my post to correct my mistake - it was adyc who
said he owned one :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-24 17:19:19 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Sure, I already edited my post to correct my mistake - it was adyc who
> said he owned one :)

No harm, no foul! I will readily admit that, in years past, I've had my
dalliances (as many others have) with tweaks, etc. that have proven to
be harmless, but useless. My wire and interconnects are decent quality
and reasonably priced stuff from Blue Jeans. I do not believe that a
uber-expensive Ethernet or usb cables are going to change the sound of
my system. I do not believe that one version of my server o/s is going
to sound better than the other, etc., etc. The hardware in my system
is solid quality stuff but I do keep an open mind---particularly in the
analog noise end of things---that there may be some brilliant and
ethical folks out there that could come up with some ways to reduce
noise that we pretty much know is there. What the audible effect of
that is...I do not know. However, there seem to be a fair number of
unrelated folks out there who have tried this REGEN in their systems and
report comparable, audible results--along the lines of "I didn't know
there was noise there until it was removed". Expectation/perceptual
bias?...at $175, I'm not sure why, then, all the hoopla to justify a
rather small investment. But, truly, I don't know and I've not seen any
double blind tests that might serve to empirically verify.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 17:34:58 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> No harm, no foul! I will readily admit that, in years past, I've had my
> dalliances (as many others have) with tweaks, etc. that have proven to
> be harmless, but useless. My wire and interconnects are decent quality
> and reasonably priced stuff from Blue Jeans. I do not believe that a
> uber-expensive Ethernet or usb cables are going to change the sound of
> my system. I do not believe that one version of my server o/s is going
> to sound better than the other, etc., etc. The hardware in my system
> is solid quality stuff but I do keep an open mind---particularly in the
> analog noise end of things---that there may be some brilliant and
> ethical folks out there that could come up with some ways to reduce
> noise that we pretty much know is there. What the audible effect of
> that is...I do not know. However, there seem to be a fair number of
> unrelated folks out there who have tried this REGEN in their systems and
> report comparable, audible results--along the lines of "I didn't know
> there was noise there until it was removed". Expectation/perceptual
> bias?...at $175, I'm not sure why, then, all the hoopla to justify a
> rather small investment. But, truly, I don't know and I've not seen any
> double blind tests that might serve to empirically verify.
Yep, agreed, there are a lot of dead ends & cul-de-sacs in this audio
hobby. A fair number of disappointments if you try every tweak/device
that purports to improve the sound. It's difficult to tease out the ones
that will deliver Vs the ones that won't - there are so many use cases &
variables involved. As you say, a consensus of improvement by enough
people on diverse systems with no obvious fanboy bias, is probably a
good start to identifying products which may be worth personally
checking out.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 14:30:43 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Seems to me that this is FFT basics 101 - incorrectly interpreting the
> "grass" seen on an FFT as the "noisefloor" - in Archimago's graph
> -140dB
>
> Have a read of this document in order to understand
> http://www.ni.com/white-paper/4278/en/
>
>
> What is being shown in the graph is "narrowband noise level in each FFT
> bin." not the noise floor although the noise floor can be calculated
> from it given some background information.
>
>

Not at all. i was clearly referring to the discrete signal at 8 KHz,
which had been introduced in the document that I had just quoted.

The comments about the grass level being dependent on FFT bucket size
are of course right on, but it was not mentioned until you brought it up
and then it was 100% gratuitous.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 15:51:02 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Not at all. i was clearly referring to the discrete signal at 8 KHz,
> which had just been introduced in the document that I had just quoted.
> To clarify something that happens 8 times a millisecond has a repetition
> rate of 8 KHz. This is a subtly of USB that people who are probing the
> limits with a variety of USB equipment become aware of.
>
> If a piece of USB audio gear fails to show a spike at 8 KHz, then it is
> a white mark. If its 100 dB down more or less, its probably not going to
> an audible problem but one might prefer to see it absent in gear with
> SOTA pretensions.The 8KHz spike has nothing to do with what the Regen device is
addressing

> The comments about the grass level being dependent on FFT bucket or bin
> size are of course right on FFT 101, but it was not mentioned until it
> was brought it up in the post I'm replying to, and then it was 100% OT
> and gratuitous.No, not mentioned by you but repeatedly referred to by Archimago on his
blog. Maybe, as a fellow objectivist, you should straighten out his
misunderstandings as it gives objectivists a bad reputation when they
don't understand the FFT 101 basics?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 16:34:28 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> The 8KHz spike has nothing to do with what the Regen device is
> addressing - a complete red herring showing a lack of understanding of
> what the Regen is designed to do.
>

Ignores the fact that the article discussed more than just the Regen
device.

I'll stand on the relevance of my quotes - how can be wrong if they are
taken directly from the cited article?

Enough of this OT banter - the article was well written, somewhat wide
ranging, and concluded quite clearly.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 16:48:01 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Ignores the fact that the article discussed more than just the Regen
> device.
>
> I'll stand on the relevance of my quotes - how can be wrong if they are
> taken directly from the cited article?
>
> Enough of this OT banter - the article was well written, somewhat wide
> ranging, and concluded quite clearly.

Well it seems clear to me that the article clearly states that the 8KHz
noise from the USB protocol engine is not the target of the Regen but
rather the USB PHY noise. The 3rd paragraph of the article reads:
"This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol
engine and from the USB PHY. The protocol engine noise does not depend
on the input signal quality, just the data, so its impact is always
going to be the same no matter what is done with the input.
*_The_PHY_is_the_part_that_actually_connects_to_the_electrical_signals_on_the_bus,_ITS_contribution_to_packet_noise_IS_dependent_on_the_quality_of_the_input_signal._This_is_the_part_the_REGEN_targets._*

So please explain why both you & Archimago ignore this distinction &
then proceed to confuse matters with red-herrings about 8KHz noise?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 16:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Similarly, Archimago might care to answer why he wants to borrow a
Regen, to measure it's reduction of the 8KHz spike when this is not the
target of the device?
A typical red-herring measurement, as per usual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 17:28:15 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Similarly, Archimago might care to answer why he wants to borrow a
> Regen, to measure it's reduction of the 8KHz spike when this is not the
> target of the device?
> A typical red-herring measurement, as per usual.

There must be some confusion about exactly which product is being
discussed.

I went here: 'Regen Home Page'
(http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen)

And found this text:

"
The USB REGEN takes the digital audio stream from your computer or other
music streaming device, and generates a completely new USB data signal
to feed to your DAC. It accomplishes this by combining a carefully
chosen USB hub chip with an ultra low-noise regulator and low-jitter
clock. Importantly, it does so with ideal impedance
matching—right at the input of your DAC.

If you are familiar with the variations in sound quality that come from
different computer configurations, USB cables, and power supplies (no,
"bits are bits" really does not apply when pursuing the audio summit),
then you will immediately recognize the often dramatic effect that the
REGEN can have on the the connection you feel with the music.

*-Although the REGEN does not eliminate all sound quality differences
between USB cables in a high-end system, it significantly reduces those
differences.-* John Swenson has written about how the PHY chips and
processors at the input of every USB DAC (even those with galvanic
isolation) are sensitive to "packet noise modulation" and ground-plane
noise—caused by poor signal integrity and impedance mis-matching.
Every USB audio source (computer or streamer) and cable causes this,
every DAC is affected by this—and the REGEN is the cure.
"

Specifically the following very broad statement seems to be in the cited
source:

"Although the REGEN does not eliminate all sound quality differences
between USB cables in a high-end system, it significantly reduces those
differences."

That seems to be pretty darn broad!

If the product being discussed is some other product, or if you can find
where it says that reducing the 8 KHz spike is not something that it
does not address, please help me.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 18:00:25 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> There must be some confusion about exactly which product is being
> discussed.
>
> I went here: 'Regen Home Page'
> (http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen)
>
> And found this text:
> (snip)
>
> If the product being discussed is some other product, or if you can find
> where it says that reducing the 8 KHz spike is something that it does
> not address, please help me.

I'm referring to the "article" that was linked on page one of this
thread http://uptoneaudio.com/pages/j-swenson-tech-corner & to which you
were referring to when you stated "how can be wrong if they are taken
directly from the cited article?" - not to the front page of the website
which you now try to cite. The reference in that article to "noise from
the USB protocol engine" is an obvious reference to the 8KHz noise spike
which Archimago & you both identify as directly resulting from the USB
protocol packet timing.

Where on that web page you now cite is any reference to 8KHz that you
stated here "I'll stand on the relevance of my quotes - how can be wrong
if they are taken directly from the cited article?" in answer to my post
"The 8KHz spike has nothing to do with what the Regen device is
addressing"


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-24 18:54:02 UTC
Permalink
A thing that surprises me is that this is a product that actually do
something real ( audible or not ) and suggested by SBGK who usually
write about stuff that is totally bonkers .

..but you could try the toslink or spdiff input on your DAC too , what
works best with any given DAC seems to be very implementation dependent
. And save your 175$ .

But if cash is no problem buy one if it reduces a noise that is there .

But on the other hand if your DAC sounds different on different inputs I
see either some bias at work ( non blind aka useless testing ) or a
defect product or a weird "audiophile" design choice . There is always
claims that some of the more standard jitter reducing teniques used "
sounds bad " and might not be used or some retro design with old
obsolete chips ?



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 19:36:35 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> A thing that surprises me is that this is a product that actually do
> something real ( audible or not ) and suggested by SBGK who usually
> write about stuff that is totally bonkers .I think you might be confused between "real" & "bonkers". By your above
statement you are willing to "believe" in Swenson's device as "a product
that actually do something real" because it has a plausible explanation
but no empirical evidence to show the issue i.e. no measurements showing
reduced USB signal integrity causing any noise issues & no evidence
showing that the Regen actually addresses this.

What you consider "bonkers" about SBGK's MQN software player is that
there is no "good story" that convinces you. Dare I suggest that this is
your bias in operation? Bias eneters into more than blind testing :) I
happen to believe that MQN also addresses the same issue - noise
intruding on the signal. It's just doesn't have as specific a case to
make as the Regen device does - MQN seems to effect system level noise,
whereas the Regen is very specifically addressing USB noise issues

> ..but you could try the toslink or spdiff input on your DAC too , what
> works best with any given DAC seems to be very implementation dependent
> . And save your 175$.
>
> But if cash is no problem buy one if it reduces a noise that is there .
>
> But on the other hand if your DAC sounds different on different inputs I
> see either some bias at work ( non blind aka useless testing ) or a
> defect product or a weird "audiophile" design choice . There is always
> claims that some of the more standard jitter reducing teniques used "
> sounds bad " and might not be used or some retro design with old
> obsolete chips ?Ah, the old mantra here - that all "properly designed" DACs should:
- sound the same through all inputs
- sound the same as every other "properly designed" DAC


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Mnyb
2015-05-24 19:48:32 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> I think you might be confused between "real" & "bonkers". By your above
> statement you are willing to "believe" in Swenson's device as "a product
> that actually do something real" because it has a plausible explanation.
> Yet no empirical evidence has been shown i.e. no measurements showing
> reduced USB signal integrity causing any noise issues & no evidence
> showing that the Regen actually addresses this.
>
> It seems to me that what you consider "bonkers" about SBGK's MQN
> software player is that there is not a "good story" that convinces you.
> Dare I suggest that this is your bias in operation? Bias enters into
> more than just blind testing :) I happen to believe that MQN also
> addresses the same issue - noise intruding on the signal. It's just
> doesn't have as specific a use case as the Regen device does - MQN seems
> to effect system level noise, whereas the Regen is very specifically
> addressing USB noise issues
>
> Ah, the old mantra here - that all "properly designed" DACs should:
> - sound the same through all inputs
> - sound the same as every other "properly designed" DAC

Well we have to wait and see if anyone test this product properly
ideally with several different USB DAC's it would be nice to the analog
out on DAC where this product is used .
And something have happened with DAC's the last decade you get good to
extreme performance everywhere ( it was not so in the 90's ) hence many
boutique designers go to tubes NOS design or old chips to be sure that
their design do sound different ;) or the latest fad with novel filter
designs



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 19:57:31 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> Well we have to wait and see if anyone test this product properly
> ideally with several different USB DAC's it would be nice to the analog
> out on DAC where this product is used.But they would have to be "properly designed" DACs, wouldn't they? You
know the ones that have don't sound different through their different
inputs. Maybe you could name some of these - the ones that would be
acceptable for testing the Regen on?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-24 22:12:02 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> I'm referring to the "article" that was linked on page one of this
> thread http://uptoneaudio.com/pages/j-swenson-tech-corner & to which you
> were referring to when you stated "how can be wrong if they are taken
> directly from the cited article?" - not to the front page of the website
> which you now try to cite.
>

In fact the first post in this thread references this article:
http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen.

The other article was brought in as a side discussion and appears to
have been subsequently dropped from the discussion.

Bringing it back up again is obviously yet another deflection, just like
the gratuitous and OT attempt to make an issue out of how FFTs treat
random noise, as well as the bogus attempt to bring in DBTs which also
had not been mentioned. Then there is the slight matter of completely
missing a very obvious 8 KHz coherent tone in the FFT that I referenced
from the thread.

The discussion has obviously descended to a level where little real
information is being discussed.

There is really no here, here. ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-24 22:27:10 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> In fact the first post in this thread references this article:
> http://uptoneaudio.com/products/usb-regen.
>
> The other article was brought in as a side discussion and appears to
> have been subsequently dropped from the discussion.
>
> Bringing it back up again is obviously yet another deflection, just like
> the gratuitous and OT attempt to make an issue out of how FFTs treat
> random noise, as well as the bogus attempt to bring in DBTs which also
> had not been mentioned. Then there is the slight matter of completely
> missing a very obvious 8 KHz coherent tone in the FFT that I referenced
> from the thread.
>
> THE DISCUSSION HAS OBVIOUSLY DESCENDED TO A LEVEL WHERE LITTLE REAL
> INFORMATION IS BEING DISCUSSED.
>
> There is really no here, here. ;-)

Yes, Arny, you & Archi can continue with your fantasy discussion about
8KHz noise but maybe you should start another thread to do so as this
thread is about the Uptone Regen which has nothing to do with that
issue.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Archimago
2015-05-25 11:49:50 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Yes, Arny, you & Archi can continue with your fantasy discussion about
> 8KHz noise but maybe you should start another thread to do so as this
> thread is about the Uptone Regen which has nothing to do with that
> issue.

Huh? What "fantasy discussion"? We are talking about what the USB Regen
is supposed to be doing, right?

Over the years people have talked about issues with noise through the
USB system including Jon Swenson concerned about the 8kHz packet
noise... I've demonstrated on the blog evidence that this could be
picked up and amplified through my Emotiva XSP-1 preamp as a measurable
issue. As I also said, it's -not -a universal issue because it's not
heard through the DAC directly but that noise can be picked up
peripherally through a specific analogue input (and put through the gain
through my preamp and amps). That's about as "read" as it gets for
audiophile discussions I believe. Heck I can even -hear- the darn
contaminant as I showed in one of the videos.

To me the potential of the USB Regen (and other devices that supposedly
clean up USB noise like the JitterBug) is clear. Since I have not seen
any objective evidence that this device "works" elsewhere, if it
actually cleans up that 8kHz tone for me like I have already attenuated
to some extent using the optical cable + external USB hub, then $175
isn't a problem since I already paid $100 for the USB optical cable and
I'd be able to objectively show the reduction in specifically that 8kHz
noise/tone. It'd be fantastic if the optical USB cable + USB Regen
completely removes that 8kHz packet noise! But as it stands currently,
I'm not sure I want to plunk down $175 to get this shipped to Canada
when I have other ideas of ways to deal with this issue... Thus I was
wondering if someone can lend me one locally in Vancouver for a couple
nights!

That IMO would be interesting to know and I think others would find that
observation beneficial (plus add some objective data to demonstrate the
positive effect of this device).



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 12:30:37 UTC
Permalink
Archimago wrote:
> Huh? What "fantasy discussion"? We are talking about what the USB Regen
> is supposed to be doing, right?Yes, not about what you mistakenly THINK it might be doing.

> Over the years people have talked about issues with noise through the
> USB system including Jon Swenson concerned about the 8kHz packet
> noise... I've demonstrated on the blog evidence that this could be
> picked up and amplified through my Emotiva XSP-1 preamp as a measurable
> issue. As I also said, it's -not -a universal issue because it's not
> heard through the DAC directly but that noise can be picked up
> peripherally through a specific analogue input (and put through the gain
> through my preamp and amps). That's about as "read" as it gets for
> audiophile discussions I believe. Heck I can even -hear- the darn
> contaminant as I showed in one of the videos.So?. JS has specifically stated that the Regen is not addressing the USB
protocol 8KHz noise spikes or did you not read the 3rd paragraph of the
article?

> To me the potential of the USB Regen (and other devices that supposedly
> clean up USB noise like the JitterBug) is clear. Since I have not seen
> any objective evidence that this device "works" elsewhere, if it
> actually cleans up that 8kHz tone for me like I have already attenuated
> to some extent using the optical cable + external USB hub, then $175
> isn't a problem since I already paid $100 for the USB optical cable and
> I'd be able to objectively show the reduction in specifically that 8kHz
> noise/tone. It'd be fantastic if the optical USB cable + USB Regen
> completely removes that 8kHz packet noise! But as it stands currently,
> I'm not sure I want to plunk down $175 to get this shipped to Canada
> when I have other ideas of ways to deal with this issue and there's no
> objective evidence that it would work for what I need... Thus I was
> wondering if someone can lend me one locally in Vancouver for a couple
> nights!I see. So a device is introduced which targets an issue that you have
not measured & you decide that it must operate according to your
criteria.
This strikes me as typical of your method - it's called "observational
bias" or the "streetlight effect" or the "drunkard's search" - taken
from an old joke
> *A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a
> streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys
> and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes
> the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk
> replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why
> he is searching here, and the drunk replies, "this is where the light
> is.*"[2]

Archimago wrote:
> That IMO would be interesting to know and I think others would find that
> observation beneficial (plus add some objective data to demonstrate the
> positive effect of this device).

No, this is exactly what is wrong with your approach - test for the
wrong thing & when nothing is found, add to the doubt about the efficacy
of the device.
None of what you do is about trying to find the truth of the matter (as
you purport you are doing) rather it is about self-promotion.
Your post gives ample evidence of this motivation in action.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 12:41:14 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
>
> So?. JS has specifically stated that the Regen is not addressing the USB
> protocol 8KHz noise spikes or did you not read the 3rd paragraph of the
> article?
>

I find the third paragraph hard to follow.

"This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol
engine and from the USB PHY. The protocol engine noise does not depend
on the input signal quality, just the data, so its impact is always
going to be the same no matter what is done with the input. The PHY is
the part that actually connects to the electrical signals on the bus,
ITS contribution to packet noise IS dependent on the quality of the
input signal. This is the part the REGEN targets."

It does not seem to directly comment on 8 KHz noise, except perhaps very
obliquely. But the oblique explanation seems to contradict claims made
on the site's home page. How are we to know which part of the web site
is more important?

Since you seem to understand it please explain, if possible with quotes.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 13:37:30 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I find the third paragraph hard to follow.
>
> "This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol
> engine and from the USB PHY. The protocol engine noise does not depend
> on the input signal quality, just the data, so its impact is always
> going to be the same no matter what is done with the input. The PHY is
> the part that actually connects to the electrical signals on the bus,
> ITS contribution to packet noise IS dependent on the quality of the
> input signal. This is the part the REGEN targets."
>
> It does not seem to directly comment on 8 KHz noise, except perhaps very
> obliquely. But the oblique explanation seems to contradict claims made
> on the site's home page. How are we to know which part of the web site
> is more important?
>
> Since you seem to understand it please explain, if possible with quotes.

I'm pretty sure you are feigning not understanding this as another one
of your forum debate tactics but :

*"This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol
engine and from the USB PHY.*" You already posted & quoted a link which
explains exactly what this means
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?103684-uptone-audio-regen&p=819082&viewfull=1#post819082


>
>
> The 1 ms frame rate in full speed / low speed USB, is used for a number
> of purposes, such as scheduling access to the bus, and as a timing
> reference for interrupt and isochronous transfers.
>
> For high speed, a higher frame rate was deemed appropriate, while still
> maintaining a relationship with the existing 1 kHz rate.
>
> To this end, high speed uses the 'Microframe' which is 125us long (8
> Microframes per millisecond). The correspondence with the 1ms frame
> numbering is maintained in the high speed SOF packets by repeating each
> frame number in 8 successive Microframes.

So, can I ask why you post & quote links which you now claim not to
understand the meaning of?

\"THE PHY IS THE PART THAT ACTUALLY CONNECTS TO THE ELECTRICAL SIGNALS
ON THE BUS, ITS CONTRIBUTION TO PACKET NOISE IS DEPENDENT ON THE QUALITY
OF THE INPUT SIGNAL. THIS IS THE PART THE REGEN TARGETS.\"
I'm not John Swenson but I have read what he says & my understanding of
this is that the USB PHY has to work harder to recover clock & data from
signals that have some degradation in them. In other words the lower the
signal integrity the harder the PHY has to work to do this recovery.

If you need a more technical explanation look here
http://electronicdesign.com/boards/480-mbitss-signal-integrity-becomes-issue-usb-20-designs
> The IEEE-1394 specification requires two differential pairs, which
> simplifies the task of recovering clock and data signals. These signals
> can be extracted by simply implementing a logic function on both pairs.
> USB 1.0 and 2.0 specifications require only one differential pair. This
> makes it more difficult to recover the clock and data signals. With USB
> 1.0 at 12 Mbits/s, one could perform a brute-force oversampling of data
> using a 48-MHz clock to extract the data. But at the USB 2.0 rate of 480
> Mbits/s, this approach would require a 1.6-GHz clock. Because sampling
> at these speeds isn't practical, it's necessary to use a more
> sophisticated clock/data recovery method.
>
> With the single differential pair that's used for USB 2.0, the ability
> to read at the middle of the data eye is critical. One method for
> performing clock and data recovery is to use a delay-locked loop (DLL)
> to generate a number of sampling clocks. With this approach, the
> designer must incrementally select a different tap until it's at the
> middle of the data eye.
>
> A 480-MHz clock cycle is 800 ps long. By sampling data every 80 ps for a
> few clock periods, it's possible to compare the data recovered from each
> tap and "vote" on the results. Over several clock cycles, it's possible
> to determine the best sample point—that is, the center of the data eye.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 13:45:10 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> I'm pretty sure you are feigning not understanding this as another one
> of your forum debate tactics but :
>

Thank you John for revealing your situation in this conversation by
posting more dire accusations of me that you made up.

>
> *"This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol
> engine and from the USB PHY.*" You already posted & quoted a link which
> explains exactly what this means
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?103684-uptone-audio-regen&p=819082&viewfull=1#post819082
>
> Why do you post & quote links which you now claim not to understand the
> meaning of?
>

Believe it or not, quoting and posting links as you have done above is
far from understanding what they mean in general or the context of this
thread.

Since you don't seem to be able to explain what the quotes mean in your
own words, it could be concluded that your familiarity with the topic
only extends to cutting and pasting text.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 13:51:28 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Thank you John for revealing your situation in this conversation by
> posting more dire accusations of me that you made up.
>
>
>
> Believe it or not, quoting and posting links as you have done above is
> far from understanding what they mean in general or the context of this
> thread.
>
> Since you don't seem to be able to explain what the quotes mean in your
> own words, it could be concluded that your familiarity with the topic
> only extends to cutting and pasting text.
And another forum debating tactic of yours is revealed or as "Man in the
Van" quickly identified - your roundabout


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 13:54:03 UTC
Permalink
Arny, you bring nothing to this thread but noise!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 14:17:04 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
>
> No, this is exactly what is wrong with your approach - test for the
> wrong thing & when nothing is found, add to the doubt about the efficacy
> of the device.
>

Isn't honest skepticism a healthy thing?

I've read and quoted the vendor's top level description of this device
and it seems like it is close to being a panacea. It seems like someone
could test for just about any USB interface vice and this product would
address it.

I've also read a article of many in an less-than-totally conspicuous
list of blog posts where in technical words of art the vendor seems (to
me) to admit that the device has pronounced limitations, and as I
understand it, its standing as a panacea for USB-related audible ills is
very questionable.

We have before us a person who seems to have documented USB-related
audible ills in his audio system.

It appears that his problem may not be addressed by this device, and he
has explained why.

He seems to be criticized, called names, and generally abused for his
trouble.

However, the glowing panacea-like claims for this device remain in a
highly conspicuous place on the vendor's web site, while the highly
technical caveats seem to be hidden away in a blog.

If the device were described transparently up front, it seems like this
situation would have never come up.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-25 15:40:55 UTC
Permalink
A few comments from a non-technical person:

1. On the general issue of charging for a hardware modification/upgrade
to an existing product, I really have no problem with charging the very
modest $45 fee. After all, they're not claiming that the original
product was not useable or defective and then charging folks so that it
works properly.

2. It appears to me that there is some agreement on the issue of noise
generated by this PHY thing as being real. It seems that it does exist
and, depending on the degree of it, would have some detrimental effect.

3. Skepticism is, indeed healthy and what Arny has pointed out, and
rightly so, is that without testing each individual dac, and each
individual cable in each setup, we don't know to what, if any, degree
the noise is being generated and, if so, how much degradation is
actually occurring.

4. To use Arny's lead in the water example, it is not unreasonable in
this day and age for people to recognize that there is a problem but
that identifying the extent to which each individual household has the
problem would be time and cost-prohibitive for the vast majority. So,
we stick a filter on our drinking water faucet or an in-line filter
under our sinks. Which is, I believe, the equivalent of the REGEN.
There is variability in the degree to which REGEN users have said the
device affects their systems which, under this analogy would make sense.


5. I would also point out that, Arny, your inference that JS/Uptone is
claiming that ALL audio systems have SI problems is a bit of a reach.
The inferred counter-argument that NO audio systems have SI problems is
just as much of a reach. Granted, your next comment about any given
system needing to be tested to prove the existence of an SI issue is,
theoretically, valid, but per my point #4 above probably not real-world
practical.

6. Bottom line seems to be whether or not folks want to spend $175 for
to deal with an issue which is real, but the extent of which is
impossible for most of us to determine in each individual use case. So,
from one's computer/server to the REGEN, spending $50 on a better
quality USB cable then the one being used that was lifted from that pile
of non-descript USB cables that many of us have sitting around, and then
connecting the REGEN directly to the dac using the hard adapter seems to
give reasonable assurance that this issue is dealt with. How that
translates into something we can actually hear with normal ears....I'm
not opening that Pandora's box. But there are several REGEN threads
that have all kinds of listening impressions posted.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 01:45:08 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> A few comments from a non-technical person:
>
> 5. I would also point out that, Arny, your inference that JS/Uptone is
> claiming that ALL audio systems have SI problems is a bit of a reach.
>

This inference is false. The alleged SI problems that JS/Uptone is
claiming to address are so vaguely defined that I don't see how it can
be known that they are universal or highly peculiar or somewhere
in-between.

I now understand that it is common for people on this forum to imagine
bad things about other people and their posts and purport that they are
true. This appears to be an example of that.

I invite you to actually quote something I wrote and show how it can be
logically construed to mean the above. Failing to do so has obvious
consequences for you.

>
> 6. Bottom line seems to be whether or not folks want to spend $175 for
> to deal with an issue which is real, but the extent of which is
> impossible for most of us to determine in each individual use case.
>

It appears that there are no public examples of any technical analysis
of actual USB signals or empirical evidence related to the operation of
real world USB gear that illustrate what this product actually does.
Please correct me if such things actually exist. In absence of such
evidence, there appears to be no objective empirical evidence that the
issue that the product purports to address actually exists or that the
product actually addresses it. Thus, it may be far worse than a pig in a
poke because we at least know that pigs actually exist somewhere. I
don't see how we know that the issue the product purports to address
exists anywhere.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-26 03:30:53 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> This inference is false. The alleged SI problems that JS/Uptone is
> claiming to address are so vaguely defined that I don't see how it can
> be known that they are universal or highly peculiar or somewhere
> in-between.
>
> I now understand that it is common for people on this forum to imagine
> bad things about other people and their posts and purport that they are
> true. This appears to be an example of that.
>
> I invite you to actually quote something I wrote and show how it can be
> logically construed to mean the above. Failing to do so has obvious
> consequences for you.
>
>
>
> It appears that there are no public examples of any technical analysis
> of actual USB signals or empirical evidence related to the operation of
> real world USB gear that illustrate what this product actually does.
> Please correct me if such things actually exist. In absence of such
> evidence, there appears to be no objective empirical evidence that the
> issue that the product purports to address actually exists or that the
> product actually addresses it. Thus, it may be far worse than a pig in a
> poke because we at least know that pigs actually exist somewhere. I
> don't see how we know that the issue the product purports to address
> exists anywhere.

To answer your first point. What you said was, "Any claim that all
audio systems have problems with poor SI is obviously false." Perhaps I
misconstrued your remark, so please explain how that was not an
inference that JS/Uptone are claiming that all audio systems have SI
issues?

Secondly I think you're barking up the wrong tree here, Arny. The
correct and proper person to take this up with would be John Swenson.
He's truly the only one out there that can back up (or not) the why's
and how's of his product design. Perhaps in the context of a private
conversation with him you might learn more about his engineering theory
and designs. Without that, you and everybody else are just speculating.


A decent amount of what you say makes sense. I don't know you and maybe
we'd enjoy each other's company in person but, frankly, the tone that
you take is pedantic and off-putting and I doubt it's just me that has
this take---whether one agrees or disagrees with your opinions. Between
you and jkeny it's definitely oil and water. Somewhat amusing to watch
but hard to get through the rhetoric. I think your style gets in the
way of your substance. And I'd say the same to jkeny.



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 07:17:04 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> To answer your first point. What you said was, "Any claim that all
> audio systems have problems with poor SI is obviously false." Perhaps I
> misconstrued your remark, so please explain how that was not an
> inference that JS/Uptone are claiming that all audio systems have SI
> issues?
>

There is no perhaps here. The remark has been forcibly and violently
misconstrued. The only question in my mind is whether it was
misconstrued as an honest error, or maliciously. It is very possible
that some people who read that remark have the same perceptual
difficulty that makes it impossible for them to read when I write: "Some
amplifiers sound different" without perceiving: "All amplifiers sound
the same." Their name is Legion!

>
> Not to mention that I'd be well within the bounds of your own "rules of
> engagement" to ask you for empirical proof that your statement is
> actually correct and true---which, by definition, would mean that you
> have, indeed, tested all audio systems and proven with measurements
> that, in fact, some do and some don't have poor SI, or that none do.
>

The above statement is doubly in error. The first error is that I don't
have to test every audio system to find that in fact some of them don't
have poor SI. All I have to do is test one of them and find that it
doesn't have poor SI. The second error is that I'm not in the business
of managing the SI of audio systems, and I have made no claims that
special SI modification products cause audible changes (I'm a skeptic
about that, too), so the burden of any such proof does not fall on me,
but on those who have made a business out of doing the same. I'm just a
skeptic trying to use such flawed tools for science and reason as I have
to make sense of the world about me and perhaps share a few of my
findings with others who may for some odd reason be interested in the
same. ;-)

>
> Secondly I think you're barking up the wrong tree here, Arny. The
> correct and proper person to take this up with would be John Swenson.
> He's truly the only one out there that can back up (or not) the why's
> and how's of his product design. Perhaps in the context of a private
> conversation with him you might learn more about his engineering theory
> and designs. Without that, you and everybody else are just speculating.
>
>

Since Mr. Swenson has presented himself as an authority in these things,
and does not appear to have provided any empirical evidence let alone
proof, it is indeed up to him to back up his claims. As I've said
before my role in this situation is being an honest, rational,
transparent skeptic. However, it appears that you have been functioning
as his advocate.

>
> A decent amount of what you say makes sense. I don't know you and maybe
> we'd enjoy each other's company in person but, frankly, the tone that
> you take is pedantic and off-putting and I doubt it's just me that has
> this take---whether one agrees or disagrees with your opinions.
>

I gave this matter a little thought and did some research. The Regen is
a novel device - its a USB 2.0 hub with one (1) downstream port. I don't
know that there are any other such devices because in terms of the
function of a USB hub it makes no sense. The purpose of a USB hub is to
connect additional devices to a USB host port, and this one is unable to
do that.

The normal retail price of a USB 2.0 hub with a useful number (>1)
downstream ports is about $2, and more like $5 with a external power
supply. Those prices are for postpaid delivery of new merchandise from
one or more eBay sellers. The parts for making such things are just
about a drug on the market because the world is rapidly migrating to USB
3.0.

Therefore it appears that Swenson has happened upon a methodology for
selling degenerate USB 2.0 hub circuit cards containing obsolete parts
for about 22 times market value ($45), and if he adds a case and a power
supply his price multiplier is more like 35 ($175). Nice work if you can
get it but knowing what I know technically, I'd have to compromise my
ethics to do it. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that any person
actually doing this sort of thing is either ethically challenged or
lacks certain technical knowledge that I am privy to.

>
> Between you and jkeny it's definitely oil and water. Somewhat amusing
> to watch but hard to get through the rhetoric. I think your style gets
> in the way of your substance. And I'd say the same to jkeny.

I don't see any difference between you and jkeny, except a matter of
degree - IOW the number of times each of you has violently misconstrued
my statements. Jkeny is way ahead in that contest because he's had
months more time to do it. Check the annals of the Hydrogen Audio and
Audio Video Science forums. His aggressive stance here can be reasonably
interpreted as the consequences of hurt pride.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
SBGK
2015-05-26 11:31:56 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> There is no perhaps here. The remark has been forcibly and violently
> misconstrued. The only question in my mind is whether it was
> misconstrued as an honest error, or maliciously. It is very possible
> that some people who read that remark have the same perceptual
> difficulty that makes it impossible for them to read when I write: "Some
> amplifiers sound different" without perceiving: "All amplifiers sound
> the same." Their name is Legion!
>
>
>
> The above statement is doubly in error. The first error is that I don't
> have to test every audio system to find that in fact *-some-* of them
> don't have poor SI. I guess you need to read up on the meaning of the
> word *-Some-*. All I have to do is test one or a very few of them and
> find that it doesn't have poor SI. The second error is that I'm not in
> the business of managing the SI of audio systems, and I have made no
> claims that special SI modification products cause audible changes (I'm
> a skeptic about that, too), so the burden of any such proof does not
> fall on me, but on those who have made a business out of doing the same.
> I'm just a skeptic trying to use such flawed tools for science and
> reason as I have to make sense of the world about me and perhaps share a
> few of my findings with others who may for some odd reason be interested
> in the same. ;-)
>
>
>
> Since Mr. Swenson has presented himself as an authority in these things,
> and does not appear to have provided any empirical evidence let alone
> proof, it is indeed up to him to back up his claims. As I've said
> before my role in this situation is being an honest, rational,
> transparent skeptic. However, it appears that you have been functioning
> as his advocate and may have invested a little money and ego in his
> business (IOW equipment purchased or on order). I have no financial
> arrangements with anybody who competes with him. Unless someone makes a
> better case for this kind of thing, I never will.
>
>
>
> I gave this matter a little thought and did some research. The Regen is
> a novel device - its a USB 2.0 hub with one (1) downstream port. I don't
> know that there are any other such devices because in terms of the
> function of a USB hub it makes no sense. The purpose of a USB hub is to
> connect additional devices to a USB host port, and this one is unable to
> do that.
>
> The normal retail price of a USB 2.0 hub with a useful number (>1)
> downstream ports is about $2, and more like $5 with a external power
> supply. Those prices are for postpaid delivery of new merchandise from
> one or more eBay sellers. The parts for making such things are just
> about a drug on the market because the world is rapidly migrating to USB
> 3.0.
>
> Therefore it appears that Swenson has happened upon a methodology for
> selling degenerate USB 2.0 hub circuit cards containing obsolete parts
> for about 22 times market value ($45), and if he adds a case and a power
> supply his price multiplier is more like 35 ($175). Nice work if you can
> get it but knowing what I know technically, I'd have to compromise my
> ethics to do it. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that any person
> actually doing this sort of thing is either ethically challenged or
> lacks certain technical knowledge that I am privy to.
>
>
>
> I don't see any difference between you and jkeny, except a matter of
> degree - IOW the number of times each of you has violently misconstrued
> my statements. Jkeny is way ahead in that contest because he's had
> months more time to do it. Check the annals of the Hydrogen Audio and
> Audio Video Science forums. His aggressive stance here can be reasonably
> interpreted as the consequences of hurt pride and possible financial
> losses that he may blame me for.

I'm sure JS can back up the design with measurements, but why should he.
Enough people are happy to take a $175 punt on something that is getting
rave reviews and is backed up by ground breaking research and
engineering.

You've obviously got a bee in your bonnet about it, perhaps a beer and a
cool shower would help.



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 12:11:25 UTC
Permalink
SBGK wrote:
> I'm sure JS can back up the design with measurements,
>

That is a fine emotion, but is it true?

I know enough about audio and measurements and listening tests to
suspect that reliable positive evidence for the Regen may not exist.

>
> but why should he. Enough people are happy to take a $175 punt on
> something that is getting rave reviews and is backed up by ground
> breaking research and engineering.
>


As I said, markups of 22x to 35x nice work if you can get it, but my
technical background and ethics keep it from being an option.


>
> You've obviously got a bee in your bonnet about it, perhaps a beer and a
> cool shower would help.

You have completely misinterpreted me. The people who make a fool out of
themselves over simple reasonable statements are grist for my mill. I
love watching people, particularly Placebophiles.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 12:21:59 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> You have completely misinterpreted me. The people who make a fool out of
> themselves over simple reasonable statements are grist for my mill. I
> love watching people, particularly Placebophiles.

Take note, all. This is what it all boils down to - the desire to
ridicule and belittle anyone who wants to play with stereo equipment,
but isn't willing to toe the ABX line.

This is a petty way to spend your time, Arny. In all seriousness,
you've probably forgotten more about how audio works than most of us
will ever know. But your incessant need to constantly shoot down anyone
who disagrees with the veracity of ABX tests precedes you. We all know
what your eventual agenda is, so the thinly-veiled initial
reasonableness of your arguments is easily pierced by those of us who've
dealt with you before.

It's a big world out there. Why not extend your reach to include the car
guys who buy expensive tires where cheaper ones will do, or women who
purchase tiny pots of >$100 cream?

Sigh.
Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 12:37:07 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> Take note, all. This is what it all boils down to - the desire to
> ridicule and belittle anyone who wants to play with stereo equipment,
> but isn't willing to toe the ABX line.
>

Another example post containing made up evil about others and spewed as
if it were the truth.

Where would you get the strange idea that I don't like to play and play
with my stereo equipment? No, its just another made-up fantasy.

Where did you get the idea that my comments are relevant to ABX? Have I
mentioned it here? No, its just another made-up fantasy.

Reality is that people who wish to share ideas about their audio
experiences can provide whatever evidence they wish. It is true that I
know how to scientifically evaluate the reliability of such evidence
that is presented. However, I'm fine with any evidence that is
presented and will grant it full credibility as long as there is reason
to believe that it is not developed by means that are well known to have
outlandish amounts of false positives or false negatives.

If someone perchance figures out how to avoid outlandish numbers of of
false positives and/or false negatives while not using ABX or any other
kind of DBT methodology, I'd love to see it!

>
> This is a petty way to spend your time, Arny.
>

I'm retired and can't line up enough relevant charitable or for profit
work to fill all of my time. I do many hours of both every week, but its
not yet enough. That's my excuse - what is yours? ;-)

>
> In all seriousness, you've probably forgotten more about how audio
> works than most of us will ever know.
>

I recommend that you never try to come close to me in that regard
because it would change your life, my friend!


>
> But your incessant need to constantly shoot down anyone who disagrees
> with the veracity of ABX tests precedes you.
>

A statement with no evidence affirming it, ample contrary evidence
contradicting it, and therefore no credibility.

What's unclear about:

"I'm fine with any evidence that is presented and will grant it full
credibility as long as there is good reason to believe that it is not
developed by means that are well known to have outlandish amounts of
false positives or false negatives."


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 13:08:21 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Another example post containing made up evil about others and spewed as
> if it were the truth.
>

I'm not sure what sort of response I expected. Perhaps "Sweet blue
jesus, Jason, you're right! What have I been doing? I'm off to rail
against the cosmetics industry!

arnyk wrote:
>
> Where would you get the strange idea that I don't like to play and play
> with my stereo equipment? No, its just another made-up fantasy.
>

I kind of got the feeling that you were too busy measuring it.

arnyk wrote:
>
> Where did you get the idea that my comments are relevant to ABX? Have I
> mentioned it here? No, its just another made-up fantasy.
>

Right you are. You'll accept sighted tests as proof of difference.
Thanks for correcting me.

arnyk wrote:
>
> If someone perchance figures out how to avoid outlandish numbers of of
> false positives and/or false negatives while not using ABX or any other
> kind of DBT methodology, I'd love to see it!
>

Seriously though - this really is the nut of the matter.

arnyk wrote:
>
> I'm retired and can't line up enough relevant charitable or for profit
> work to fill all of my time. I do many hours of both every week, but its
> not yet enough. That's my excuse - what is yours? ;-)
>

I occasionally reach my tipping point with regard to pedanticism.
You're not the worst in this regard, but you are, in many ways, the
standard bearer for the ABX crowd, and those who seem to glean a
perverse pleasure in ridiculing audiophiles.

Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 13:57:48 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
>
>
> > Arnyk wrote:
> >
> > Where would you get the strange idea that I don't like to play and play
> > with my stereo equipment? No, its just another made-up fantasy.
> > > >
>
> I kind of got the feeling that you were too busy measuring it.
>

Another one of those Placebophile fantasies, I guess.

Measuring is like sex - it always gets over too fast. ;-)

Seriously, the whole point of basing decisions on reliable facts is the
pursuit of better sound quality.

Nobody has credibly explained to me how basing decisions on fantasies
and falsehoods gets anyplace helpful. Yet, there are so many who run
their lives that way. Go figure!

Some people like to live in a fantasy world where everything is as they
perceive or dream it up to be. One of the problems with pursuing
reliable truth is that from time to time you may find that things are
not exactly as you previously thought. Unreliable listening tests avoid
that sort of thing and keep the fantasies and falsehoods alive.

doctor_big wrote:
>
> > Arnyk wrote:
> >
> > If someone perchance figures out how to avoid outlandish numbers of of
> > false positives and/or false negatives while not using ABX or any other
> > kind of DBT methodology, I'd love to see it!
> > > >
>
> Seriously though - this really is the nut of the matter.
>

Exactly. Nobody seems to know of a better way, if the goal is reliable
information. Do you know of a better way to obtain reliable
information?

Some people don't seem to care whether the world they perceive is true
or false, and others do.

Through long and sometimes harsh experience I have found it to be most
helpful and profitable to be committed to reliable truths, oppose that
as you will and have.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 14:11:18 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
>
> I don't see any difference between you and jkeny, except a matter of
> degree - IOW the number of times each of you has violently misconstrued
> my statements. Jkeny is way ahead in that contest because he's had
> months more time to do it. Check the annals of the Hydrogen Audio and
> Audio Video Science forums. *His aggressive stance here can be
> reasonably interpreted as the consequences of hurt pride and possible
> financial losses that he may blame me for*.

Some points:
- my stance with you is because I know what I'm dealing with, as does
Jason. Your claim of innocent sceptic doesn't fool us for a moment
- You modus operandi is to continuously claim that you have been
misconstrued (usually violently)
- your well practised in back-tracking as many will have gathered on
this thread
- as you have already demonstrated you have an aversion to audio &
business (your attempt to denigrate the Regen is pathetic)
- Yes ABX would come into this if JS produced his measurements - we
already had a sniff of it regarding the 8KHz noise spike
- finally even if positive ABX results are produced you will reject
them, if it shakes your world-view, on the basis that you don't trust
the listener doing the test

As I said before you bring nothing to this debate only noise


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 14:28:42 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Some points:
> - my stance with you is because I know what I'm dealing with, as does
> Jason. Your claim of innocent sceptic doesn't fool us for a moment
>

Thank you for showing your good faith by calling me a liar and
deceiver.

>
> - You modus operandi is to continuously claim that you have been
> misconstrued (usually violently)
>

It is a common situation which I have already documented in this thread
that there are many people who are so biased that properly comprehending
simple English statements describing things they are in denial about is
impossible.

>
> - your well practised in back-tracking as many will have gathered on
> this thread
>

Please cite your evidence for this claim.

>
> - as you have already demonstrated you have an aversion to audio &
> business (your attempt to denigrate the Regen is pathetic)
>

Anybody who wishes can provide whatever reliable evidence as they may
have that shows that I have misjudged the product. Seeing none but
ample personal attacks I'm prone to think that I'm onto something here.


>
> - Yes ABX would come into this if JS produced his measurements - we
> already had a sniff of it regarding the 8KHz noise spike
>

There has been conversation between myself and the person who measured
the 8 KHz spike and I know of no controversy related to it. You seem to
be promoting a belief that there is disagreement there. Please provide
whatever evidence you may have to support your claims which the extant
facts do not seem to support.

jkeny your speculations about any measurements performed by anybody are
pure speculation until such measurements are performed and made public
and announced on this thread. Yet you seem to have presented my
conclusions about them as if they were already an accomplished fact.
I'll be generous and point out that this is just more evidence that you
live in a fantasy world of your own creation that suits your ego and
your prejudices. In this world it appears that you are right no matter
what you do. Whatever!

>
> - finally even if positive ABX results are produced you will reject
> them, if it shakes your world-view, on the basis that you don't trust
> the listener doing the test
>

jkeny your speculations about any listening tests performed by anybody
are pure speculation until such listening tests are performed and made
public and announced on this thread. Yet you seem to have presented my
conclusions about them as if they were already an accomplished fact.
I'll be generous and point out that this is just more evidence that you
live in a fantasy world of your own creation that suits your ego and
your prejudices. In this world it appears that you are right no matter
what you do. Whatever!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 14:38:33 UTC
Permalink
And now we're into the usual forum debating mode - the usual noise

Let me cut through all that - would you trust a Foobar log showing
positive ABX results from me?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 14:44:34 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> And now we're into the usual forum debating mode
>
> Let me crystallise it for you - would you trust a Foobar log showing
> positive ABX results from me?

jkeny I don't think you have what it takes to provide such a thing (and
this opinion has been shared on another forum where you are well known),
so I have *-no-* thoughts about it ever happening.

The usual procedure is to evaluate evidence as it appears. You've
already demonstrated in recent posts that you don't see the need for
this approach, so there is no need to discuss this further.

Here is a relevant piece of friendly advice:

A rule of thumb is that a single listening test by a single person is a
single data point and that it takes confirmation by means of additional
listening tests performed by other people to create a critical mass of
strong evidence.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 16:43:36 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> jkeny I don't think you have what it takes to provide such a thing (and
> this opinion has been shared on another forum where you are well known),
> so I have *-no-* thoughts about it ever happening.
>
> The usual procedure is to evaluate evidence as it appears. You've
> already demonstrated in recent posts that you don't see the need for
> this approach, so there is no need to discuss this further.
>
> Here is a relevant piece of friendly advice:
>
> A rule of thumb is that a single listening test by a single person is a
> single data point and that it takes confirmation by means of additional
> listening tests performed by other people to create a critical mass of
> strong evidence.

As you well know I have produced positive ABX results on AVS forum for
differentiating high-res files & you rejected both mine & Amir's
numerous positive results saying that you distrusted us & that only if
the test was run with a trusted administrator would you accept any
results from me or him. So you have rejected multiple positive results
by different people on the basis that you don;t trust them

You are jut playing your usual games, Arny which are transparent to all
- each bit of evidence that you don't like is rejected & further
requirements or tests called for.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 16:56:05 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Dodging the question, Arny
>
> As you well know I have produced positive ABX results on AVS forum for
> differentiating high-res files & you rejected both mine & Amir's
> numerous positive results saying that you distrusted us & that only if
> the test was run with a trusted administrator would you accept any
> results from me or him. So you have rejected multiple positive results
> by different people on the basis that you don't trust them.
>
> Of course you have proven just how low you will sink in your attempts at
> muddying the waters by publishing your ABX test purporting it to be a
> real attempt at an ABX listening test when, in fact the timing in the
> ABX log shows that you were randomly hitting keys at a fast pace. The
> log showed 1 second response for some trials - the majority of trials
> taking 4 seconds or less.
>
> You are jut playing your usual games, Arny which are transparent to all.

Well, isn't this -exciting!-

Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 17:13:55 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> Well, isn't this -exciting!-
>
> Jason

As Arny is always citing "evidence for your claim" let me link to the
post & ABX log of which I speak?

Arny posted his ABX results here without a mention that he was randomly
guessing
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/91-audio-theory-setup-chat/1835641-mpa-vs-flac-2.html#post30564017
> The comparison was of a 24/192 file titled "15 Haydn_ String Quartet In
> D, Op_ 76, No_ 5 - Finale" to a 256 kbps MP3 based on it prepared using
> Lame. This file happens to be exact same one that was recently the star
> of an AES paper that Amir has been heaping praise onto.
>
> The playback DAC+ headphone amp was an Asus U7 which is capable of
> handling 192 KHz sample rate files with good performance.
>
> The playback transducers were the highly regarded Audio Technica ATH-M50
> headphones.
>
> The ABX log is as follows:
>
> foo_abx 2.0 beta 4 report
> foobar2000 v1.3.5
> 2015-01-06 21:04:53
>
> File A: 15 Haydn_ String Quartet In D, Op_ 76, No_ 5 - Finale - Presto +
> cues 256kbps.mp3
> SHA1: f24d8c506ae5d38fd7d3a8e7700ee8595cd5e025
> File B: 15 Haydn_ String Quartet In D, Op_ 76, No_ 5 - Finale - Presto +
> cues.wav
> SHA1: 961320fa0baa1983130304bed02df943a32cfe25
>
> Output:
> DS : Primary Sound Driver
>
> 21:04:53 : Test started.
> 21:05:18 : 00/01
> 21:05:39 : 01/02
> 21:06:39 : 02/03
> 21:06:45 : 03/04
> 21:06:47 : 04/05
> 21:06:50 : 04/06
> 21:06:54 : 04/07
> 21:06:56 : 05/08
> 21:06:58 : 06/09
> 21:06:59 : 07/10
> 21:07:01 : 07/11
> 21:07:04 : 07/12
> 21:07:05 : 08/13
> 21:07:08 : 08/14
> 21:07:10 : 08/15
> 21:07:31 : 08/16
> 21:07:31 : Test finished.
>
> ----------
> Total: 8/16
> Probability that you were guessing: 59.8%
>
> -- signature --
> b54eb2a632d09ae60dbb1c13774d4152ee32f110
>
>
> In short my ears are as I have said not up to this sort of thing, but to
> please Amir...

It was quickly noticed by me & others that the log revealed more than he
liked -

> Output:
> DS : Primary Sound Driver
>
> 21:04:53 : Test started.
> 21:05:18 : 00/01
> 21:05:39 : 01/02 --- 21 seconds
> 21:06:39 : 02/03 --- 60 seconds
> 21:06:45 : 03/04 --- 6 seconds
> 21:06:47 : 04/05 --- 2 seconds!!!
> 21:06:50 : 04/06 --- 3 seconds!!!
> 21:06:54 : 04/07 --- 4 seconds!!!
> 21:06:56 : 05/08 --- 2 seconds!!!
> 21:06:58 : 06/09 --- 2 seconds!!!
> 21:06:59 : 07/10 --- 1 second!!!!
> 21:07:01 : 07/11 --- 2 seconds!!!
> 21:07:04 : 07/12 --- 3 seconds!!!
> 21:07:05 : 08/13 --- 1 second!!!
> 21:07:08 : 08/14 --- 3 seconds!!!
> 21:07:10 : 08/15 --- 2 seconds!!!
> 21:07:31 : 08/16 --- 21 seconds
> 21:07:31 : Test finished.


When I brought this up on Hydrogen Audio I was told that it was quiet OK
to just guess if you can't hear any difference in the first couple of
attempts - the excuse proferred that "life is too short"


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 18:03:54 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> As Arny is always asking for "evidence for your claim" let me link to
> the post & ABX log of which I speak?
>
> Arny posted his ABX results here with lots of detail about the running
> of the test - music pieces used, MP3 codec used, headphones & amp used
> but not a mention that he was randomly guessing after the first 2 trials
> http://www.avsforum.com/forum/91-audio-theory-setup-chat/1835641-mpa-vs-flac-2.html#post30564017
>

As usual jkeny is not telling the whole story. I have posted at that
time that I took the test, produced random results, and lost the FB2K
log file. I posted a FB2K file with similar results based on a test that
was done for show.

If you want to see me doing seriously doing ABX tests, follow these
links:

http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=107570&view=findpost&p=895219

http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=107570&view=findpost&p=895047

and for extra fun you can try these files which I also aced, but again
lost the FB2K log file.

http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=107570&view=findpost&p=899634


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 17:24:45 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
>
> As you well know I have produced positive ABX results on AVS forum for
> differentiating high-res files
>

I did not know that. As usual you falsely claim that I am omniscient.
I'm not.

You are talking about the AIX files, right?

>
> you rejected both mine & Amir's numerous positive results saying that
> you distrusted us & that only if the test was run with a trusted
> administrator would you accept any results from me or him.
>

I don't believe that happened, either. I do remember that I said
something analogous to what I said above:

"A rule of thumb is that a single listening test by a single person is a
single data point and that it takes confirmation by means of additional
listening tests performed by other people to create a critical mass of
strong evidence."

>
> So you have rejected multiple positive results by different people on
> the basis that you don't trust them.
>

False.

I know of no valid high resolution audio files that have been presented
on AVS in recent times. The severe shortcomings of the AIX files are
covered here:

http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?103650-What-ever-happened-to-the-quot-AVX-AIX-High-Resolution-Test-quot

I don't recall mentioning any problems with the people who took the
tests in the thread above. The problems were with the test files
themselves.

For the record, I myself obtained positive results with those files (see
evidence in the thread mentioned above). My rejection of positive
results extends to my results as well. Sauce for the goose is sauce for
the gander.

I know the reason why I heard differences because I'm skilled enough of
a listener to know what I'm hearing, and what I was hearing was the
rather severe audible error in the files which I also documented with
technical evidence. It was not related to sample rates.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jfo
2015-05-26 17:45:25 UTC
Permalink
This is one of the few times when a moderator would be useful and delete
this useless banter. Please take your boring, childish argument
elsewhere.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jfo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1135
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jfo
2015-05-27 00:55:44 UTC
Permalink
jfo wrote:
> This is one of the few times when a moderator would be useful and delete
> this useless banter. Please take your boring, childish argument
> elsewhere.

Bump. Anyone out there who can deal with these trolls?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jfo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1135
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Greg Erskine
2015-05-27 01:03:40 UTC
Permalink
jfo wrote:
> Bump. Anyone out there who can deal with these trolls?

Hi jfo,

The best solution to people you believe to be trolls is to add them to
your "ignore list". I have found this works great on other forums I
frequent.

regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 17:46:15 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I did not know that. As usual you falsely claim that I am omniscient.
> I'm not.
>
> You are talking about the AIX files, right?No, I'm talking about your final set of "Jangling keys" files & you
replied on AVS to my post of the log showing my positive ABX results. My
log was also posted in that Hydrogen Audio thread which you heavily
participated in. More selective memory, Arny or just being
disingenuous?

> I don't believe that happened, either. I do remember that I said
> something analogous to what I said above:
>
> "A rule of thumb is that a single listening test by a single person is a
> single data point and that it takes confirmation by means of additional
> listening tests performed by other people to create a critical mass of
> strong evidence."
>
>
>
> False.
>
> I know of no valid high resolution audio files that have been presented
> on AVS in recent times. The severe shortcomings of the AIX files are
> covered here:
>
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?103650-What-ever-happened-to-the-quot-AVX-AIX-High-Resolution-Test-quot
>
> I don't recall mentioning any problems with the people who took the
> tests in the thread above. The problems were with the test files
> themselves.
>
> For the record, I myself obtained positive results with those files (see
> evidence in the thread mentioned above). My rejection of positive
> results extends to my results as well. Sauce for the goose is sauce for
> the gander.
>
> I know the reason why I heard differences because I'm skilled enough of
> a listener to know what I'm hearing, and what I was hearing was the
> rather severe audible error in the files which I also documented with
> technical evidence. It was not related to sample rates.

Trying to muddy the waters yet again!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Wombat
2015-05-26 17:52:09 UTC
Permalink
Now that is related to the regen?



Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 18:06:48 UTC
Permalink
Wombat wrote:
> Now that is related to the regen?

There is nothing more to say about the Regen other than for people to
try it for themselves & report their findings

What the last page has been about is Arny's attempts at slandering the
business practices of Uptone audio & the cost of the Regen in
particular.

It would appear that people on here don't know him or his past, apart
from Jason & I
So, before he gets much further in his attempts at trying to ruin a
company & their product I felt it was necessary to put his motivations
into some sort of context.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Wombat
2015-05-26 18:10:07 UTC
Permalink
Anold is known by more people as you expect. Hopefully others read
around about you and your way to act in forums also.



Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 18:16:45 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> There is nothing more to say about the Regen other than for people to
> try it for themselves & report their findings. There may be more to say
> if JS or someone else produces measurements that show the affect of the
> Regen?
>
> What the last page has been about is Arny's attempts at slandering the
> business practices of Uptone audio & the cost of the Regen in
> particular.
>
> It would appear that people on here don't know him or his past, apart
> from Jason & I
> So, before he gets much further in his attempts at trying to ruin a
> company & their product I felt it was necessary to put his motivations
> into some sort of context.

I've always found that trying to nail Arny down is like trying to nail
jello to a wall. In some ways it's like dealing with religious
fundamentalists - not with regard to the message at all, but rather the
deflection and obfuscation that you're constantly having to navigate
It's an observationalist thing -- they think they're being clever -- but
AK's the master. It's one of those I-don't-know-why-I-bother kind of
things. And for the most part, I don't. Kind of like Ronnie (Man in a
Van - who isn't a sock puppet I guarantee) who says that he's quite
happy listening to the improvements wrought by expectation bias, I just
change things around as I see fit, and enjoy the sound quality
improvements.

However, as I said earlier (maybe in another thread?) occasionally I
reach my tipping point and then must chime in. For all the good it
does.

Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
rgro
2015-05-26 18:43:43 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> I've always found that trying to nail Arny down is like trying to nail
> jello to a wall. In some ways it's like dealing with religious
> fundamentalists - not with regard to the message at all, but rather the
> deflection and obfuscation that you're constantly having to navigate
> It's an observationalist thing -- they think they're being clever -- but
> AK's the master. It's one of those I-don't-know-why-I-bother kind of
> things. And for the most part, I don't. Kind of like Ronnie (Man in a
> Van - who isn't a sock puppet I guarantee) who says that he's quite
> happy listening to the improvements wrought by expectation bias, I just
> change things around as I see fit, and enjoy the sound quality
> improvements.
>
> However, as I said earlier (maybe in another thread?) occasionally I
> reach my tipping point and then must chime in. For all the good it
> does.
>
> Jason

Hoo, boy. Clearly, I've been thoroughly vanquished by the master. Not
only that, but I just found out that, unbeknownst to me, I'm functioning
as John Swenson's advocate and that some clever thief has come in, taken
both my money and, after Arny's thorough pummeling of it, what's left of
my now sadly diminished ego and used both to invest in Uptone Audio's
business (which I'm sure will be great news to them!)--a business which
I had no idea even existed until about 10 days ago. Truly, this dude is
a piece of work!!



Rg

System information
------------------------
Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite > USB> Benchmark DAC2 D > LFD LE IV
Signature amp > Revel Performa F208 speakers.

Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) > Pioneer VSX 919 > Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1, Touch FW 7.8.0-r16754.

LMS 7.9.0 - 0.71.20150313git1426153261 on a 1TB Micro Vortexbox
Appliance, V 2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 18:44:55 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> I've always found that trying to nail Arny down is like trying to nail
> jello to a wall.
>

Back at you, fellow. I ask simple questions, you deflect the discussion
into something else, usually personal attacks like the one above.

>
> In some ways it's like dealing with religious fundamentalists - not
> with regard to the message at all, but rather the deflection and
> obfuscation that you're constantly having to navigate
>

This must be a quote from a post by me to some radical subjectivist!
;-)

>
> It's an observationalist thing -- they think they're being clever -- but
> AK's the master.
>

There is no cleverness here, just a search for reliable truth.

>
> It's one of those I-don't-know-why-I-bother kind of things. And for
> the most part, I don't. Kind of like Ronnie (Man in a Van - who isn't a
> sock puppet I guarantee) who says that he's quite happy listening to the
> improvements wrought by expectation bias, I just change things around as
> I see fit, and enjoy the sound quality improvements.
>

There seem to be lot of people who realize that there is a real world,
and real improvements in sound quality to be obtained. You just have to
stick to reality to find them.

You've never explained how acting on false information is a reliable
route to actual improvements in sound quality - just another one of
those questions that were deflected rather and answered, I guess.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
SBGK
2015-05-26 19:57:20 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Back at you, fellow. I ask simple questions, you deflect the discussion
> into something else, usually personal attacks like the one above.
>
>
>
> This must be a quote from a post by me to some radical subjectivist!
> ;-)
>
>
>
> There is no cleverness here, just a search for reliable truth.
>
>
>
> There seem to be lot of people who realize that there is a real world,
> and real improvements in sound quality to be obtained. You just have to
> stick to reality to find them.
>
> You've never explained how acting on false information is a reliable
> route to actual improvements in sound quality - just another one of
> those questions that were deflected rather and answered, I guess.

Guess we'll find out about the impact of the regen in time. More power
to JS for sticking his neck out to produce such a device. One things
for certain, the backwoods of the audio forums will always be populated
by bitter trolls.



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 20:03:08 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Back at you, fellow. I ask simple questions, you deflect the discussion
> into something else, usually personal attacks like the one above.

Hey! I wasn't talking to you. But since you're here, do you even own a
squeezebox? Or did you just hear that the fishin's fine and presto,
joined right up?

As an aside from all this nastiness, an observation - I honestly think
that ABX is the tipping point on the seesaw between the Os and the S'.
Audiophiles mightily distrust ABX, and with good reason, I think. I've
taken part in two of those hateful experiments, and found myself utterly
wamboozled and unable to concentrate on the music without thinking about
the test. "Is this this, or this?" Perhaps practice helps? I've also
participated in blind AB tests at a prominent Canadian speaker
manufacturer, and found them entertaining, informative and stress free.
Take what you will from that. Anyway, I don't have a better, feasible,
repeatable test to offer, so the standoff shall continue, yes?

Back to your regularly scheduled programming - let the snippiness
resume.

Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 20:21:55 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
>
> I honestly think that ABX is the tipping point on the seesaw between the
> Os and the S'.
> > > >
> >
> > I remember life before ABX as I was an audiophile for more than 20 years
> > before ABX as we know it now.
> >
> > First off the alleged disparity between the O's and S's was designed to
> > hoodwink naive audiophiles. It is an invention of sales hacks as opposed
> > to professional salesmen. If you look up the meaning of the words, and
> > understand how they are used outside of audio, it becomes quite clear
> > that they were bastardized for some purpose, which was to keep
> > audiophiles as naive as possible.
> >
> > > > > > >
> > > Audiophiles mightily distrust ABX, and with good reason, I think.
> > > > > > >
> >
> > Almost all audiophile thinking about ABX is based on what they were
> > told, not what they have experienced. Only a miniscule fraction of
> > audiophiles have any hands-on experience with a well-run ABX test.
> > Audiophiles queuing up for their first ABX test have been
> > brainwashed by the audiophile exploitation marketing establishment
> > to distrust them and be in a a high state of anxiety.
> >
> > > > > > >
> > > I've taken part in two of those hateful experiments, and found myself
> > > utterly wamboozled and unable to concentrate on the music without
> > > thinking about the test. "Is this this, or this?"
> > > > > > >
> >
> > Your words reveal your highly biased state of mind.
> >
> > It is common for people who have lived their whole lives being
> > coached to perceive what is advantageous for sales hacks (as opposed
> > to professional sales people), making judgments based solely on
> > prejudices and sales pitches.
> >
> > The first time audiophiles actually have to just listen, they are in
> > a state of vertigo because all of their sighted cues are gone and
> > for the first time they have to rely on what they hear, not what
> > they have been educated to believe.
> >
> > > > > > >
> > > Perhaps practice helps?
> > > > > > >
> >
> > Of course practice helps! ABX was designed to allow people to take
> > a break and train and practice as they wish. You can't possibly
> > have a meaningful listening experience as long as you are dependent
> > on the crutch of sighted evaluations.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 20:00:26 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> I've always found that trying to nail Arny down is like trying to nail
> jello to a wall. In some ways it's like dealing with religious
> fundamentalists - not with regard to the message at all, but rather the
> deflection and obfuscation that you're constantly having to navigate
> It's an observationalist thing -- they think they're being clever -- but
> AK's the master. It's one of those I-don't-know-why-I-bother kind of
> things. And for the most part, I don't. Kind of like Ronnie (Man in a
> Van - who isn't a sock puppet I guarantee) who says that he's quite
> happy listening to the improvements wrought by expectation bias, I just
> change things around as I see fit, and enjoy the sound quality
> improvements.
>
> However, as I said earlier (maybe in another thread?) occasionally I
> reach my tipping point and then must chime in. For all the good it
> does.
>
> Jason

Yes, Jason, you & I both know how practised he is at this style of forum
deflection & obfuscation but it's still worth pointing this out for
those not so familiar. I don't expect any change in Arny - but the more
he posts, the more he reveals that his claim of "searching for reliable
truth" is a sham, a smokescreen

I'm sure many wonder why he attempts slandering a $175 product & the
Uptone audio's business practises? A product, that by all accounts, has
so far delivered audible benefits to a wide range of users on a wide
variety of USB audio devices. A product that has a clear technical
message about what exactly it is targeting.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 18:39:44 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> There is nothing more to say about the Regen other than for people to
> try it for themselves & report their findings.
>

Yes, lets forget about the facts of the matter being that it is
apparently a degenerate USB hub fabricated with soon-to-be obsolete
parts selling for about 35 times what a real USB hub costs.

>
> There may be more to say if JS or someone else produces measurements
> that show the affect of the Regen?
>

As has been pointed out, JS has been already highly incentivized to
avoid doing such a thing.
>
> What the last page has been about is Arny's attempts at slandering the
> business practices of Uptone audio & the cost of the Regen in
> particular.
>

A key element of slander is untrue statements. Please point out the
untrue statements!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 20:20:34 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Yes, lets forget about the facts of the matter being that it is
> apparently a degenerate USB hub fabricated with soon-to-be obsolete
> parts selling for about 35 times what a real USB hub costs.Sure it's based on a USB hub chip & I can tell you the chip ID & even a
hub that contains such chip if you want to go off & buy one. But beware
the hubs you get for $5 are built with no consideration for impedance or
even electrical safety & will blow your USB port as quick as you can say
"ABX test"

>
> As has been pointed out, JS has been already highly incentivized to
> avoid doing such a thing.
>
>
> A key element of slander is untrue statements. Please point out the
> untrue statements!More bile that I'll resist responding to but keep posting Arny - your
self-revelations are amusing


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 21:05:26 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Sure it's based on a USB hub chip & I could tell you the chip ID (which
> the Uptone guys stated). But beware the hubs you get for $5 are built
> with no consideration for impedance or even electrical safety & will
> blow your USB port as quick as you can say "ABX test"
>

Commodity hubs habitually blowing USB gear is a false claim. But jkeny,
I'll bet you can bully naive audiophiles with trash talk like that.

I can hear it now, "It wasn't my anti-engineered USB DAC that blew
itself up, but your cheap USB hub"

Your descent into that sort of sales tactics is as you say jkeny, very
revealing.

Talk about business practices! But its alright because you want to do
it...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 21:57:07 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Commodity hubs habitually blowing USB gear is a false claim. But jkeny,
> I'll bet you can bully naive audiophiles with trash talk like that.
>
> I can hear it now, "It wasn't my anti-engineered USB DAC that blew
> itself up, but your cheap USB hub"
>
> Your descent into that sort of sales tactics is as you say jkeny, very
> revealing.
>
> Talk about business practices! But its alright because you want to do
> it...

What sales tactic?
Go ahead & buy this powered USB hub for $3 & power it with external
supply, Arny & then let us know your results.
http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=103&cp_id=10307&cs_id=1030702&p_id=10065&seq=1&format=2

Also maybe look into some other cheap USB hubs?'
Problem USB hubs'
(http://elinux.org/RPi_Powered_USB_Hubs#Problem_USB_Hubs)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 22:08:01 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> What sales tactic?
> Go ahead & buy this powered USB hub for $3 & power it with external
> supply, Arny & then let us know your results.
> http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=103&cp_id=10307&cs_id=1030702&p_id=10065&seq=1&format=2
>

Can't do it. If you checked your links you'd know it is out of stock.

This is rich because the out of stock condition just might be based on
the problem (or not) but wanna bet that the new one is "fixed". Yup.

>
> Also maybe look into some other cheap USB hubs?'
> Problem USB hubs'
> (http://elinux.org/RPi_Powered_USB_Hubs#Problem_USB_Hubs)

Classic case of deceptively moving the goal posts. The discussion was
about blowing up DACs with cheap USB hubs and now every possible
difference no matter how subtle, is being offered as proof of the claim
about blowing up USB hubs.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
ralphpnj
2015-05-26 22:36:47 UTC
Permalink
Wow all this pointless discussion and trash talking over $175 tweak.
What happen if the item being discussed cost $1750?



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-26 22:42:41 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Can't do it. If you checked your links you'd know it is out of stock.
>
> This is rich because the out of stock condition just might be based on
> the problem (or not) but wanna bet that the new one is "fixed". Yup.WHy not get it in green then & see if it's fixed
http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=103&cp_id=10307&cs_id=1030702&p_id=10067&seq=1&format=2

> Classic case of deceptively moving the goal posts. The discussion was
> about blowing up DACs with cheap USB hubs and now every possible
> difference no matter how subtle, is being offered as proof of the claim
> about blowing up USB hubs.
Nope lots of examples of these hubs missing the "hub diode that prevents
back-powering," - "that is, current cannot flow in the reverse
direction from the hub coaxial power connector back out to the micro B
input port and into the Raspberry Pi." See the diagram below from that
e-Linux site

The Monoprice hub is one such hub. The point is "don't expect even basic
electrical engineering for $3" - I don't know what you expect for $3?

18128


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: USBHubRaspberryPiPowerHookup.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=18128|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
SBGK
2015-05-27 02:16:06 UTC
Permalink
ralphpnj wrote:
> Wow all this pointless discussion and trash talking over $175 tweak.
> What happen if the item being discussed cost $1750?

then you and JULF would step in and shout about audiophoolery and how
the manufacturers were ripping off the poor innocent customers, but as
it doesn't cost $1750 the only contribution is to imagine if it did.
lol

I thought Americans celebrated success, here is an innovative product
which people are raving about and what do we get, the usual crapola.



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Julf
2015-05-27 08:31:24 UTC
Permalink
SBGK wrote:
> then you and JULF would step in and shout about audiophoolery and how
> the manufacturers were ripping off the poor innocent customers, but as
> it doesn't cost $1750 the only contribution is to imagine if it did.

Boy do you seem to be carrying a grudge. I guess you really don't like
being proven wrong, do you?



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 23:43:30 UTC
Permalink
Hey all (and not Arny)

I just took a peek at Mr K's profile, and every post he's made in the
short time he's been here has been in regard to some sort of measurement
wankery. Not one SB-related micron of information. He's trolling,
pure and simple.

And the first target of his vitriol? John Swenson - perhaps one of the
most storied contributors to the Squeezebox ecosystem. No matter how it
ended up for John, he gave more to this community than almost anyone
else.

This should be shut down and his account cancelled.

Jason


------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Greg Erskine
2015-05-27 00:56:47 UTC
Permalink
doctor_big wrote:
> Hey all (and not Arny)
>
> I just took a peek at Mr K's profile, and every post he's made in the
> short time he's been here has been in regard to some sort of measurement
> wankery. Not one SB-related micron of information. He's trolling,
> pure and simple.
>
> And the first target of his vitriol? John Swenson - perhaps one of the
> most storied contributors to the Squeezebox ecosystem. No matter how it
> ended up for John, he gave more to this community than almost anyone
> else.
>
> This should be shut down and his account cancelled.
>
> Jason

Hi Jason,

I don't think this is the right course of action.

I have enjoyed reading this thread, especially arnyk's posts. It's also
nice to see jkeny back!

I certainly agree with arnyk's point of view on this topic but don't
have the debating skills to be constructively involved.

Also, there "may" be other silent arnyk supporters. No, I don't have any
evidence. ;)

regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-26 18:10:12 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> No, I'm talking about your final set of "Jangling keys" files & you
> replied on AVS to my post of the log showing my positive ABX results. My
> log was also posted in that Hydrogen Audio thread which you heavily
> participated in. More selective memory, Arny or just being disingenuous?
>

jkeny, I repeat, I am not omniscient. Stuff happens around me and I
don't always notice it. I sometimes post a few words and don't recall it
a few days later. Stuff happens. Got a link?

Those threads were huge and at times moved very fast.

These were obviously the final set of files that was posted in AVS, but
not the final set of files which were AFAIK never posted on AVS. . Those
files were also flawed, and I posted that information on AVS when I
discovered the flaws. It took me a while to fix them. More selective
memory, jkeny or just being disingenuous? ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 09:44:08 UTC
Permalink
rgro wrote:
> It is not the typical hawking of $1,000/meter cables or claims of that
> ilk. I'm not edumacated enough to know if John's theories, as he's put
> into practice, are sound science. But my lay read of his explanations
> would suggest that there's some merit here.
>
> http://uptoneaudio.com/pages/j-swenson-tech-corner
>
> It would appear to me that this REGEN device is contributing to reducing
> some kind of analog noise that almost any USB dac would produce,
> internally.
>

Lets say that your house has some lead plumbing that contaminates the
drinking water within. Here's the challenge: What can you do to the pure
water that is delivered to your house to get the lead out of the water
that comes out of the faucets in the house? There is a reasonable
answer, and that is by pre-processing the water to decrease any acidity,
the leaching of lead from the water pipes in the house can be reduced.

Reading the cited document, it appears that the USB equivalent of
contamination of water by lead plumbing in your house is:

"When the SI is very good, the PHY can turn off the pre-processing steps
and easily determine the bits. As the SI degrades the PHY turns on
different parts of the pre-processing as needed. Each of these steps
takes a fair amount of power to operate, thus creating noise on the
power and ground planes. The more processing the PHY needs to use to
determine the bits, the more noise is generated. Thus part of the packet
noise is directly related to the signal integrity of the incoming
signal. The higher the SI, the lower the noise."

There are a number of contingencies that are cited in this paragraph:

(1) The USB signal must have poor SI for the regenerator to have any
benefits because if USB signal's SI is good, there is obviously no way
to improve on it. The leading cause of poor SI on high speed USB signals
is excessively long USB cables with excessive high frequency losses.

(2) Given that the USB signal has poor SI, the claim is made that poor
SI causes additional processing to be switched on inside the USB device,
and this processing draws excessive current and degrades the signal
quality that the device can possibly deliver.

Any claim that all audio systems have problems with poor SI is obviously
false. For this product to actually provide any benefits, the presence
of poor SI in any target system needs to be validated. The easiest and
cheapest way to maintain high SI is to keep your USB cables short and
their quality reasonably high. There is no evidence that utterly
expensive high end USB cables are required to do this. If I wished to
validate the operation of this device I would set up a system with
artificially poor SI, for example one with long, poor quality cables.

There are a very large number of different USB PHY interfaces in use
given that millions if not billions of USB devices have been produced
since USB was introduced about 20 years ago. Obviously, not all USB PHY
interfaces are the same. Obviously, not all USB PHY interfaces even have
additional processing that is switched on and off in the presence of a
signal with poor SI. Actually, most of the examples of USB PHY receivers
that have some kind of switching, activate this switching based on the
speed of the equipment they are working with and leave it at that. One
would have to find a USB device that actually significantly increased
its current draw when faced with poor SI. Finally, the myriad of USB
devices would have to be sifted to find those that actually degraded
their audio performance when faced with poor SI if you wanted to set up
a test that showed that this device provided an audible benefit.

It is just common sense - if a device provides benefits by fixing a
problem, then you have to have the problem for the device to be of any
benefit to you.

>
> Not that it validates anything, but there sure seem to be an awful lot
> of folks who are liking the little gadget...and at $175 it wouldn't
> appear that John and Alex are trying to rip people off price-wise,
> either.

One big caution flag about business practices can be found here:

http://uptoneaudio.com/blogs/news/20068483-usb-regen-updated-amazing-bass-all-unshipped-orders-will-be-the-latest

The article says that 'We have added $0.40 worth of tiny resistors to
the circuit board of the USB REGEN and increased its musical performance
by 40-50%—most especially in the bass! Anyone who has a REGEN will be
astonished by the improvement, and anyone who hears the new one for the
first time will be even more amazed."

The obvious question is "What about the 100s of Regen units that have
allegedly been shipped without this allegedly amazing upgrade". The
article says that an entirely new circuit board is required, which means
that you have to essentially replace the entire unit, presumably at your
own cost.

When you are fishing, you wait for the fish to nibble the hook and then
you manipulate the line to set the hook. However, you can only pull in
one fish each time you do this. Looks to me like Uptone Audio has
figured out how to pull in many fish with just one setting of the hook.
;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Man in a van
2015-05-25 10:45:27 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
>
>
>
> One big caution flag about business practices can be found here:
>
> http://uptoneaudio.com/blogs/news/20068483-usb-regen-updated-amazing-bass-all-unshipped-orders-will-be-the-latest
>
> The article says that 'We have added $0.40 worth of tiny resistors to
> the circuit board of the USB REGEN and increased its musical performance
> by 40-50%—most especially in the bass! Anyone who has a REGEN will be
> astonished by the improvement, and anyone who hears the new one for the
> first time will be even more amazed."
>
> The obvious question is "What about the 100s of Regen units that have
> allegedly been shipped without this allegedly amazing upgrade". The
> article says that an entirely new circuit board is required, which means
> that you have to essentially replace the entire unit, presumably at your
> own cost.
>
> When you are fishing, you wait for the fish to nibble the hook and then
> you manipulate the line to set the hook. However, you can only pull in
> one fish each time you do this. Looks to me like Uptone Audio has
> figured out how to pull in many fish with just one setting of the hook.
> ;-)


If you actually read the article, the question you pose is answered, or
does that not suite the purpose of your post.

I'm not getting involved in your roundabout, but just thinking about
Dragnet (I know, I know, it's a bit like "play it again Sam") "just
stick to the facts, ma'am".

atb

Ronnie


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 11:54:28 UTC
Permalink
Man in a van wrote:
> If you actually read the article,
>

No need to be insulting. Can't we talk?

>
> the question you pose is answered,
>

Please explain, preferably with quotes from the article we are both
talking about.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 12:02:39 UTC
Permalink
Man in a van wrote:
> If you actually read the article, the question you pose is answered, or
> does that not suite the purpose of your post.
>
> I'm not getting involved in your roundabout, but just thinking about
> Dragnet (I know, I know, it's a bit like "play it again Sam") "just
> stick to the facts, ma'am".
>
> atb
>
> Ronnie

Yep, it's the usual logic from this contingent - business is involved so
therefore it's a snakeoil business trying to extricate money out of the
unthinking consumer.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Man in a van
2015-05-25 12:51:29 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> Yep, it's the usual logic from this contingent - business is involved so
> therefore it's a snakeoil business trying to extricate money out of the
> unthinking consumer.


Well Mr Keny, you're not doing so well yourself. My post was to point
out to the arnyk that they were being selective in their quotation and
that the answer to the posed question is in the article.

I think your summary of it being "a snake oil business" is strictly your
own personal opinion.

For my part, I have to declare an interest as an unthinking fish type
customer as I have had a regen thingy on order for several weeks.

Money where ones mouth is, is my motto :o

atb

Ronnie


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 12:54:56 UTC
Permalink
Man in a van wrote:
> Well Mr Keny, you're not doing so well yourself. My post was to point
> out to the arnyk that they were being selective in their quotation and
> that the answer to the posed question is in the article.
>

I saw no such concern expressed in your post.

I did see a personal attack on my literacy.

Can't we just talk?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 13:02:24 UTC
Permalink
Man in a van wrote:
> Well Mr Keny, you're not doing so well yourself. My post was to point
> out to the arnyk that they were being selective in their quotation and
> that the answer to the posed question is in the article.
>
> I think your summary of it being "a snake oil business" is strictly your
> own personal opinion.> > > You took me up wrong - I was pointing out the usual list of objections
> > that people like Arny make, the so-called objectivists - once they hear
> > "business" the hair raises on the back of their necks & all sorts of
> > allegations spew forth.
> >
> > > > > > > For my part, I have to declare an interest as an unthinking fish type
> > > customer as I have had a regen thingy on order for several weeks.
> > >
> > > Money where ones mouth is, is my motto :o
> > >
> > > atb
> > >
> > > Ronnie> > > > So do I have one on order, Ronnie :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 13:38:51 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> You took me up wrong - it's not my opinion - I was pointing out the
> usual list of objections that people like Arny make, the so-called
> objectivists - once they hear "business" the hair raises on the back of
> their necks & all sorts of allegations spew forth.
>

The above is a complete and total fabrication, not to mention the
obvious name-calling.

I am in business for myself right now, one related to IT. I have been
in the audio business in the past. My standing in the Audio Industry is
sufficient that I am a full member of The Audio Engineering Society.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
jkeny
2015-05-25 13:43:22 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> The above is a complete and total fabrication, not to mention the
> obvious name-calling.
>
> I am in business for myself right now, one related to IT. I have been
> in the audio business in the past. My standing in the Audio Industry is
> sufficient that I am a full member of The Audio Engineering Society.

So yo now want to retract this?
> "When you are fishing, you wait for the fish to nibble the hook and then
> you manipulate the line to set the hook. However, you can only pull in
> one fish each time you do this. Looks to me like Uptone Audio has
> figured out how to pull in many fish with just one setting of the hook.
> ;-)"


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
arnyk
2015-05-25 13:49:22 UTC
Permalink
jkeny wrote:
> So you now want to retract this allegation?

It's just a little homily, one that could apply to a lot of things. It
still seems to apply to the situation that it was uttered in, even
though the circumstances have changed a bit.

John, given that you have made about a dozen false allegations that were
directly pointed at me in this thread without retracting even just one
of them, your good faith is evident. You seem to live in a world where
there are two sets of rules, one very liberal and easy set of rules that
apply to just you, and one draconian set that applies to people that you
may disagree with.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Man in a van
2015-05-25 13:03:48 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
>
>
>
>
> One big caution flag about business practices can be found here:
>
> http://uptoneaudio.com/blogs/news/20068483-usb-regen-updated-amazing-bass-all-unshipped-orders-will-be-the-latest
>
> The article says that 'We have added $0.40 worth of tiny resistors to
> the circuit board of the USB REGEN and increased its musical performance
> by 40-50%—most especially in the bass! Anyone who has a REGEN will be
> astonished by the improvement, and anyone who hears the new one for the
> first time will be even more amazed."
>
> _-*The_obvious_question_is_\"What_about_the_100s_of_Regen_units_that_have_allegedly_been_shipped_without_this_allegedly_amazing_upgrade\".__The_article_says_that_an_entirely_new_circuit_board_is_required,_which_means_that_you_have_to_essentially_replace_the_entire_unit,_presumably_at_your_own_cost.
> *-_
> When you are fishing, you wait for the fish to nibble the hook and then
> you manipulate the line to set the hook. However, you can only pull in
> one fish each time you do this. Looks to me like Uptone Audio has
> figured out how to pull in many fish with just one setting of the hook.
> ;-)


Well I was not being insulting, just asking if you had read the article.

The answer to your question is here, I'm not quoting all of the answer
to save a bit of space, but one should get the gist,

> READ THIS SECTION ONLY IF YOU ALREADY HAVE A USB REGEN IN YOUR
> HANDS.[/B] LET'S DISCUSS HOW EXISTING, “REGEN GREEN” OWNERS CAN
> UPDATE TO “AMBER.” THIS SECTION IS JUST FOR THE 95 PEOPLE WHO HAVE
> BEEN ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF AN UPTONE USB REGEN FOR THE PAST FEW
> WEEKS:
> I HAVE THOUGHT LONG AND HARD ABOUT HOW TO OFFER AN UPGRADE TO YOUR
> DEVICES IN A CONVENIENT MANNER AND AT THE LOWEST POSSIBLE COST. WE ARE
> GOING TO SUBSIDIZE A PART OF THE COST, BUT TO DO SO WE ALSO HAVE TO PUT
> SOME STRICT GUIDELINES IN PLACE SO THAT TIME INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS IS
> KEPT TO A MINIMUM. SO HERE IS THE DEAL:
>
> *$45
> What does this get you?
> One new, pre-tested REGEN circuit board; One T8 Torx wrench for
> removing one end-cap of your REGEN case. You just slide the old board
> out, slide the new board in, and screw the faceplate back on.
>
> What do you do with your old board? Whatever you want! You can use it
> bare without a case, but you will need to provide your own power supply
> for it, and your own cables/adapters. Or you can just stick it in a
> drawer. But I bet you will first want to compare it to the new one.
> Remember the power-indicator LEDs are different colors so you wonÂ’t get
> mixed up.
>
> Okay, so what are the rules and restrictions for this deal?
>
> 1) [B]Wait until June 10th. But donÂ’t wait past July 10th* as this
> upgrade offer expires then.


atb

Ronnie


I'll not be posting further on this thread, I don't have enough
paracetamol :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-23 01:55:00 UTC
Permalink
Man in a van wrote:
> As a non learned, non aquainted and frankly not bothered too much about
> the opinion of others unless they are based on their experience, I
> would say they are as valid as any claims made in that blog that is in
> your signature.
>
> It might have been better if your question had been phrased in a manner
> that does not suggest you are trolling.
>
> YMMV [emoji14]
>
> Ronnie.
Go get 'im, Ronnie!

Jason.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
doctor_big
2015-05-26 20:49:28 UTC
Permalink
So I guess the answer is no, you don't own a Squeezebox and you're over
here trolling.

Got it. Continue.

Jason




------------------------------------------------------------------------
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684
Loading...