Discussion:
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 16bit or 24 bit DAC..?
daleyb
2016-05-09 21:04:49 UTC
Permalink
if I was to buy a DAC for my SBT (Not that the DAC in the SBT Is bad..)
Is it really worth going for a 24bit one.?
First off, most of my Rips Courtesy of DBPA Are flac from my CDs. I have
no 24bit tracks fro any sites (Thats not to say I will never download
any in the future..) ..

I kinda get the Impression Reading forum that Because the DACs so good
in the SBT , unless i pay a hell of a lot for a good DAC, THE Sound may
just be different-not a upgrade.Diminishing returns indeed. Of course
the SBT RUNS AT 24 BIT-sO BUYING A 16 BIT dac Could be in some-ways a
step back.

I think only a listen will convince me, and worst case- flogg it back on
flee -bay.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
daleyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=65604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
garym
2016-05-09 21:35:52 UTC
Permalink
daleyb wrote:
> if I was to buy a DAC for my SBT (Not that the DAC in the SBT Is bad..)
> Is it really worth going for a 24bit one.?
> First off, most of my Rips Courtesy of DBPA Are flac from my CDs. I have
> no 24bit tracks fro any sites (Thats not to say I will never download
> any in the future..) ..
>
> I kinda get the Impression Reading forum that Because the DACs so good
> in the SBT , unless i pay a hell of a lot for a good DAC, THE Sound may
> just be different-not a upgrade.Diminishing returns indeed. Of course
> the SBT RUNS AT 24 BIT-sO BUYING A 16 BIT dac Could be in some-ways a
> step back.
>
> I think only a listen will convince me, and worst case- flogg it back on
> flee -bay.

is it even possible to find a 16 bit DAC anymore????? and even when
playing 16/44.1 content, having 24 bit can be good because of the volume
control that may be done in the digital domain and can use some of those
extra 8 bits.



*Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* VBA 3TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
*Office:* Win8(64) > LMS 7.9 > Squeezelite
*Spares:* Touch(3), Radio(3), Boom, SB3, CONTROLLER
*Controllers:* iPhone6 & iPadAir2 (iPeng8 & Squeezepad), CONTROLLER, or
SqueezePlay 7.8 on Win7(64) laptop
*Files:* ripping: dbpoweramp > FLAC; post-rip: mp3tag, PerfectTunes;
Streaming: Spotify
------------------------------------------------------------------------
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Mnyb
2016-05-09 23:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Even a 5$ DAC today would be 24 bit .

16 bit may be much more expensive ? Because it's some kind of special
audiophile design .



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Julf
2016-05-10 07:19:22 UTC
Permalink
What everybody has already said - DACs tend to be 24 bit by default
these days, but I have not come across any commercial recordings that
would use more than a 16-bit range (even if the recording is 24 bits, it
won't gain you anything if the extra 8 bits are simply noise). For
digital volume control, the extra bits are an advantage.



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Archimago
2016-05-11 06:50:28 UTC
Permalink
Yeah, the only 16-bit DACs you're likely going to find "new" these days
are based on old NOS DACs like the old Philips TDA154x designs.

Some audiophiles seem to like them... Certainly "different" rather than
"better"!



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-11 19:16:08 UTC
Permalink
Archimago wrote:
> Yeah, the only 16-bit DACs you're likely going to find "new" these days
> are based on old NOS DACs like the old Philips TDA154x designs.
>
> Some audiophiles seem to like them... Certainly "different" rather than
> "better"!
"Audiophiles" are people too... ;)

I had a couple of old Philips players once, and subsequently an Arcam
player with a 16 bit DAC. Enjoyed the Arcam but I wouldn't call it
uniquely capable versus newer 24 bit systems. I would say it had a
particular type of distortion that's enjoyable if you like rock/dance
music..




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Archimago
2016-05-11 22:50:32 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> "Audiophiles" are people too... ;)
>
> I had a couple of old Philips players once, and subsequently an Arcam
> player with a 16 bit DAC. Enjoyed the Arcam but I wouldn't call it
> uniquely capable versus newer 24 bit systems. I would say it had a
> particular type of distortion that's enjoyable if you like rock/dance
> music..

Hey Matt... And I consider myself an "audiophile" as well. So I
certainly appreciate not being exclusive or brushing all "audiophiles"
with a single brush :-).

Speaking of these TDA154x designs, here's one just at the recent Munich
show:
http://www.audiostream.com/content/computer-audio-design-cad

A mere 7200 -pounds-. Pocket change. Interesting the article says it
accepts 24/192. Unless they're doing something fancy, these are 16-bit
parts of course from the early 1990's.



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
sckramer
2016-05-12 00:20:52 UTC
Permalink
Hi Archimago,

I ran across those strange TDA dacs, based on that old chip also --
here's the one I saw:

what do they sound like?


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: tda_dac.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=20442|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+


'AudioSystem' (http://bit.ly/1ruj0Zw) - 'YouTube'
(http://bit.ly/1ULq4fT) - 'Twitter' (http://bit.ly/1q8dTgc)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
sckramer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20311
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Archimago
2016-05-12 00:40:47 UTC
Permalink
sckramer wrote:
> Hi Archimago,
>
> I ran across those strange TDA dacs, based on that old chip also --
> here's the one I saw:
>
> what do they sound like?

Hey Sckramer, cool man! A single chip version :-). I guess ya gotta save
on the power usage with batteries.

Well, I do have a 4-chip TDA1543 I measured awhile back (bought for $60
on eBay):
http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2013/02/measurements-muse-mini-tda1543x4-nos.html

I'm not a fan of the NOS sound. I think some folks like them for
sounding "pleasant" with the dip in high frequency response. There's
also the issue of aliasing distortion. I'm tempted to check out the
filter characteristics of that DAC again since those measurements were
made many years back. These old chips are supposedly of poor linearity
hence the use in multiple parallel configuration to improve accuracy of
the conversion.



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Mnyb
2016-05-12 01:13:41 UTC
Permalink
Yes the filter less NOS DAC a very audiophile solution to the
"everything sounds the same" problem ;) ok enjoy the artifacts if you
fancy.

But as usual there are "explanations" that these things in some magical
ways really is "better" than a regular well designed DAC .

Honestly , I think we are trolled ? the original questions is a bit to
silly , but now the tread has gained its own momentum ....



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
sckramer
2016-05-12 03:45:41 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> Yes the filter less NOS DAC a very audiophile solution to the
> "everything sounds the same" problem ;) ok enjoy the artifacts if you
> fancy.
>
> But as usual there are "explanations" that these things in some magical
> ways really is "better" than a regular well designed DAC .
>
> Honestly , I think we are trolled ? the original questions is a bit to
> silly , but now the tread has gained its own momentum ....

I see re: NOS, interesting.

Ok, I just drove by-- didn't read the OP, sorry.



'AudioSystem' (http://bit.ly/1ruj0Zw) - 'YouTube'
(http://bit.ly/1ULq4fT) - 'Twitter' (http://bit.ly/1q8dTgc)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
sckramer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20311
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-12 12:31:53 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> Yes the filter less NOS DAC a very audiophile solution to the
> "everything sounds the same" problem ;) ok enjoy the artifacts if you
> fancy.
>
> But as usual there are "explanations" that these things in some magical
> ways really is "better" than a regular well designed DAC .
>
> Honestly , I think we are trolled ? the original questions is a bit to
> silly , but now the thread has gained its own momentum ....

The classic NOS DAC is based on chips in the the TDA1541-TDA1543 family
which were supposed to be used with a separate digital filter chip, such
as the SAA7220. The digital filter chip included a filter to correct
high frequency losses due to the arpature effect. By leaving it out, a
far more steeply rolled off (potentially audible) high frequency
response is obtained.

The chips in the TDA1541-TDA1543 were designed to be used singly, but
even multiples of them can be hooked in tandem to obtain improved
dynamic range. A more practical way to achieve better dynamic range is
to simply use a modern chip which can be adequate all by itself.

More modern chips have been made with strappable digital filtering to
provide a similar audible high frequency roll-off.

This sort of engineering is considered by the technical mainstream to be
backwards and wasteful, but we are talking high end audio, here.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-12 21:23:21 UTC
Permalink
I've had a Touch and a Duet for a few years now, and have yet to find a
DAC that sounds different, let alone better, than the analogue outputs
of either.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
daleyb
2016-05-13 17:28:19 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> I've had a Touch and a Duet for a few years now, and have yet to find a
> DAC that sounds different, let alone better, than the analogue outputs
> of either.

theres NO question the dac (anyone know what the DAC in SBT Is..???) in
the SBT ia very good.But I would still reckon a Dac over £500 plus may
make minor Improvements. I may need to "get this outa my system" to just
convince myself.Worst case I will resell.I have a Quad 67 Cd
Player..Which has a pretty good DAC. (THAT WAS £800 iN 1993.)...YES ITS
Still going strong (although my SBT has made it somewhat redundant
now).The SBT HAS MORE TOP END AND DETAIL IN THE midrange......than my
Quad.But in the lower bass dept the cd wins.The overall sound better
from the CD-but I enjoy the detail and energy from the SBT....


------------------------------------------------------------------------
daleyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=65604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-14 05:49:11 UTC
Permalink
The DAC in the Touch is an AKM4420.

You can check the others here:-

http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Hardware_comparison


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
daleyb
2016-05-14 10:49:55 UTC
Permalink
The DAC in the Touch is an AKM4420.

Thanks for that Info.Its interesting to see what were used in other
models to..,

btw. My Confusion with 16/24 bit came from the rega Dac/s. I read the
MK1 was only 16 bit-the M2 24 BIT.However, reading the small print tells
me Iam wrong. tHE mK 1 IS 24BIT-But only from certain outputs on it.To
make it more complex they put about 10 filter options on it! No wonder I
got mixed up.

Happy days.and thanks to one n' all


------------------------------------------------------------------------
daleyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=65604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Fizbin
2016-05-26 06:32:48 UTC
Permalink
Slightly OT but has anyone ever compared the Oppo 105 vs the
Transporter? I'm curious how the older DAC of the transporter holds up.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fizbin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58734
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-26 11:39:35 UTC
Permalink
Fizbin wrote:
> Slightly OT but has anyone ever compared the Oppo 105 vs the
> Transporter? I'm curious how the older DAC of the transporter holds up.

You want to talk about older DACs? The DACs in good quality digital
players such as the Transporter or a mid-priced CD player have generally
been free of audible defects since the late 1980s. Since then the most
significant change has been an ongoing lowering of costs to the point
where at this time a < $3 DAC chip is again free of audible flaws.

Don'y be mislead by salesman's patter touting magic DAC chips.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-26 11:58:18 UTC
Permalink
Fizbin wrote:
> Slightly OT but has anyone ever compared the Oppo 105 vs the
> Transporter? I'm curious how the older DAC of the transporter holds up.

No, but I'd agree with Arnyk that any differences will most likely be in
the analogue components of the two devices. How does the sound from the
Transporter compare to other SBs?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-26 12:20:06 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> No, but I'd agree with Arnyk that any differences will most likely be in
> the analogue components of the two devices. How does the sound from the
> Transporter compare to other SBs?

Did I say that the analog parts of digital music players cause them to
sound different? No memory of ever making that mistake!

Fact is that the passive components of just about all modern mainstream
audio gear are commodity items that are made in accordance with
international standards. IOW a resistor is generally very much like
other similar resistors, and ditto for the capacitors. The general
quality of passive parts has increased, and prices have decreased. A
legacy holy grail audio component like a Marantz 7 preamp contains
parts whose quality would get them immediately dust-binned at incoming
inspection in n a modern mid-fi audio component manufacturing plant.

Just about all modern audio gear is assembled from commodity-grade
Surface Mount Technology (SMT) parts. Just because they are commodity
grade doesn't mean that they are lacking in performance. We've come a
long way from the 1960's when all audio gear including professional
recording gear was assembled from inherently unstable (hygroscopic)
carbon composition resistors, tubes that were constantly degrading as we
used them, and wax-filled paper dielectric capacitors. The distortion
in active components like IC op amps and digital<-> analog converter
chips, while generally well below audibility, still dominates the
measured performance of most audio gear.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-26 17:06:34 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Did I say that the analog parts of digital music players cause them to
> sound different? No memory of ever making that mistake!

You're right I interpolated from what you /did/ say.. &#128515;




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Fizbin
2016-05-26 12:25:41 UTC
Permalink
Yeah, I figured the DAC's -alone- wouldn't be make or break. It would
still be interesting to compare the two. I mean, if the Transporter
sounded better, I'd have to give the ex-guys at Slim Devices some major
credit.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fizbin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58734
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-26 12:33:20 UTC
Permalink
Fizbin wrote:
> Yeah, I figured the DAC's -alone- wouldn't be make or break. It would
> still be interesting to compare the two. I mean, if the Transporter
> sounded better, I'd have to give the ex-guys at Slim Devices some major
> credit.

Level-matched, time-synched, bias controlled listening tests are
required to obtain valid results about sound quality, and frankly they
can be quite a bit of work to do right. One reason why none of the high
end ragazines and web sites do them - it takes far more effort than they
are used to exerting and produce results that run generally contrary to
their agendas.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-26 17:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Fizbin wrote:
> Yeah, I figured the DAC's -alone- wouldn't be make or break. It would
> still be interesting to compare the two. I mean, if the Transporter
> sounded better, I'd have to give the ex-guys at Slim Devices some major
> credit.
Ignore the other comments... If you're interested in trying it out then
try it out. Even if you're kidding yourself that it sounds better but
you enjoyed the process, what does it matter? This is an entertainment
system after all not a system of record. &#128515;




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-27 11:16:42 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Ignore the other comments... If you're interested in trying it out then
> try it out. Even if you're kidding yourself that it sounds better but
> you enjoyed the process, what does it matter? This is an entertainment
> system after all not a system of record. &#55357;&#56835;

So, self deception ftw then?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 11:21:10 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> So, self deception ftw then?
Well I know some people think that's what it is. I don't, but none of us
can conclusively prove it either way so who gives a c**p? Just have fun
with it. &#128515;




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-27 12:55:25 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Well I know some people think that's what it is. I don't, but none of us
> can conclusively prove it either way so who gives a c**p? Just have fun
> with it. &#55357;&#56835;

You could prove it easily by using, and I quote, "Level-matched,
time-synched, bias controlled listening tests".

But that's not going to happen any time soon, is it?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 12:55:06 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Well I know some people think that's what it is. I don't, but none of us
> can conclusively prove it either way so who gives a c**p? Just have fun
> with it. &#128515;

False claim- we can conclusively prove to reasonable persons which
so-called audible effects are self-deception, and which are not.

Of course, we have those highly biased persons who think that they are
right when they contradict established science.

Just thinking about all the anti-scientific claims that have been been
shown to be false here lately. Then the source of them says "Ignore the
other comments". LOL!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 13:39:50 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> You could prove it easily by using, and I quote, "Level-matched,
> time-synched, bias controlled listening tests".
>
> But that's not going to happen any time soon, is it?

Well, it already happened.

We invented ABX in the late 70s, and proceeded to test everything that
interested us, particularly amplifiers, CD players, and phono
cartridges. Throughout the 80s, various individuals including some of
our number did additional tests whose results were published in Stereo
Review, Audio, and a few other consumer audio publications.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-27 14:00:56 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Well, it already happened.
>
> We invented ABX in the late 70s, and proceeded to test everything that
> interested us, particularly amplifiers, CD players, and phono
> cartridges. Throughout the 80s, various individuals including some of
> our number did additional tests whose results were published in Stereo
> Review, Audio, and a few other consumer audio publications.

I know, I was referring to proving some of the more 'magical' of their
claims...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 14:15:10 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> False claim- we can conclusively prove to reasonable persons which
> so-called audible effects are self-deception, and which are not.
>
> Just thinking about all the anti-scientific claims that have been been
> shown to be false here lately. Then the source of them says "Ignore the
> other comments". LOL!

I've only been here five minutes.. hardly an old hand at "false
claims".. and I disagree that you can conclusively prove anything about
perception. I agree that you can statistically prove that there is a
"most likely" answer in a given test scenario but you can't prove that
holds true for all people at all times and under all circumstances. So
yes, for a "reasonable person" you can find sufficient statistics to
show you are most likely correct, but I can't agree that those
statistics are proof in themselves.

I get what you're saying and I'm ok with disagreeing. But why do you
need to stomp on anyone who wants to try anything out? Should we all
just buy the cheapest basic sound system we can, do a room correction
and be done with it? That is not the answer, as well as being no fun! :)

I might be wrong, who knows? But I don't feel like I've seen any proof
that what I hear/see is not what I hear and see, and I have done a few
psychovisual experiments over the years so I know I can trust my
judgement to some extent - even when the biological models say I
shouldn't be able to perceive those things. Not that I'm special, some
others could too, some couldn't. I've never taken part in a proper abx
trial such as you describe. I would like to, I guess, even though it
risks my being "proven" wrong.

So there we are. There is room for doubt, in my opinion, and if I judge
your view correctly you believe there is no room for doubt and all is
subjective perception and there are no real audible differences between
essentially any decently engineered electronics, right?




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 16:20:24 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> I disagree that you can conclusively prove anything about perception. I
> agree that you can statistically prove that there is a "most likely"
> answer in a given test scenario but you can't prove that holds true for
> all people at all times and under all circumstances.
>

As usual wew have a post that makes false claim and then assumes that
everybody agrees with it.

You've invented a highly narrow criteria which is impossible, namely:
"You can't prove that holds true for all people at all times and under
all circumstances." , and then faulted ABX testing because it can't do
that impossible thing.

There is no test that holds true for all people at all times and under
all circumstances. If it exists, name it!

That sort of false logic may fool young children, but this is generally
a forum that is populated by teenagers and adults.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 17:07:58 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> As usual wew have a post that makes false claim and then assumes that
> everybody agrees with it.
>
> You've invented a highly narrow criteria which is impossible, namely:
> "You can't prove that holds true for all people at all times and under
> all circumstances." , and then faulted ABX testing because it can't do
> that impossible thing.
>
> There is no test that holds true for all people at all times and under
> all circumstances. If it exists, name it!
>
> That sort of false logic may fool young children, but this is generally
> a forum that is populated by teenagers and adults.

Isn't that what "prove" means? Beyond any doubt? And if there is no test
that proves that for all people for all circumstances there is no real
audible difference between two components then where did I go wrong?

I didn't say your statement was wrong, just pointing out your caveat
that proving things for "reasonable people" (though I take exception to
your use of the word reasonable implying that those who don't agree with
you aren't being reasonable... ;) ) implies that it's a statistical
probability not absolute truth. Is that a fair reading of your comment?




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 17:39:49 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Isn't that what "prove" means?
>

Proving is not what science does.

Prove = your word.

Good science is based on gathering evidence and forming hypothesis that
are based on it.

>
> Beyond any doubt?
>

Everything is at least a little doubtful. Ever hear of skepticism?

>
> And if there is no test that proves that for all people for all
> circumstances there is no real audible difference between two components
> then where did I go wrong?
>

You went wrong long ago.

There is no need to prove that that for all people, for all
circumstances there is no real audible difference between two
components. First off, "Proof" is not what science does. What science
does is gather evidence, formulate hypotheses that may explain the
evidence, and then test the explanations by gathering more evidence.

The nature of real world experiments that if you perform enough
observations, at least a little contrary evidence will be gathered. That
contrary evidence may the consequences of errors, and part of the
analysis of experiment evidence is figuring out whether the contrary
evidence is simply due to the usual random errors, or if they represent
some real weakness in the hypothesis being tested.

>
> I didn't say your statement was wrong, just pointing out your caveat
> that proving things for "reasonable people" (though I take exception to
> your use of the word reasonable implying that those who don't agree with
> you aren't being reasonable... ;) ) implies that it's a statistical
> probability not absolute truth. Is that a fair reading of your comment?

As usual you have made up yet another false claim, and attributed it to
me. I never said that everybody who disagrees with me is unreasonable.
There was no use of the word reasonable implying that those who don't
agree with me aren't being reasonable. It is all a figment of your
imagination it seems.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 18:05:37 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
>
>
> Good science is based on gathering evidence and forming hypothesis that
> are based on it.
>
> Everything is at least a little doubtful. Ever hear of skepticism?
>
> As usual you have made up yet another false claim, and attributed it to
> me. I never said that everybody who disagrees with me is unreasonable.
> There was no use of the word reasonable implying that those who don't
> agree with me aren't being reasonable. It is all a figment of your
> imagination it seems.

See this is the problem.. I write some words, you take one set of
meanings from it. You write some words, I take another set of meanings
from them. This is how forums descend into flame wars. My impression is
that you're pretty dismissive of folks who don't speak the exact
phrasing that you've been using for years and there's no room for debate
(it's fair to demand that experts use the correct jargon, but for
everyone else it's just jargon -- and I never said i was an expert in
anything other than what I experienced..). Some of the things you pick
up in are totally fair, but you're also applying your own interpretation
sometimes and picking up on that, just like everyone does.

I was being a bit sarcastic when suggesting that a forum member "ignores
those guys", which you would know if you'd met me.. Yet you're picking
up on it and decided to respond with an accusation of megalomania. An
escalation. My comment really is to leave the guy alone to try things
out if that's what he wants to do. If he wants to learn from you he's
entitled to ask for advice, but forget for a minute that you overdid
your time in HiFi shops when young and now are too jaded to see the
enjoyment in it and let others take their own from the hobby. (yes I'm
putting words in your mouth, see how that works?). :)




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 23:22:36 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> See this is the problem.. I write some words, you take one set of
> meanings from it.

Yeah, yeah someone gets caught repeatedly making up false claims about
what someone else writes, and poof! it is just a misunderstanding, much
of it not even his fault.

Friendly advice, people who can't comprehend other people's posts should
save themselves a lot of grief and not bother to misunderstand them.

If I really misunderstood what you wrote, then it should be no problem
for you to post explanations of what you really meant. Can you do it?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-28 07:55:54 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Yeah, yeah someone gets caught repeatedly making up false claims about
> what someone else writes, and poof! it is just a misunderstanding, much
> of it not even his fault.
>
> Friendly advice, people who can't comprehend other people's posts should
> save themselves a lot of grief and not bother to misunderstand them.
>
> If I really misunderstood what you wrote, then it should be no problem
> for you to post explanations of what you really meant. Can you do it?
Sarcasm? Always a good way to stave off an impending flame war. ;)

I've been trying to expand on what I wrote because it's clear to me that
we a) disagree on some fundamentals (though I acknowledge I am not as
"educated" as you in the field that doesn't invalidate my observations
and nor does it excuse accusations of being weak minded), and b) you are
interpreting a lot of my observations as if I am stating these things as
incontrovertible facts. Perhaps that's my writing style, perhaps it's
your own biases, who knows. I'm not sure I care actually.

I would like to see people allowed to experiment for themselves without
being flamed to death around here.

And I am still waiting for an answer on what you guys wants to see from
the HiFi world, since most of what I see here is negative.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-28 08:48:42 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Sarcasm? Always a good way to stave off an impending flame war. ;)
> I would like to see people allowed to experiment for themselves without
> being flamed to death around here.
>

I apologize for the representatives of the DBT thought police that I
have stationed near your house to make sure that you don't try to do any
proper experiments. They are obviously acting in a too heavy handed way
if you can detect them.;-)

The problem with the experimentation that has been suggested here lately
is that it is not good useful experimentation that sheds helpful light
on the issue at hand, but rather merely muddling and playing with audio
gear and gaining self-gratification from turning the fancy knobs.

Effectively understanding the details of this problem, usually requires
university-level study of the history and experimental designs of
Science, particularly audio, or OJT training, or a mix of the two,
usually under the supervision of recognized academic authorities who are
frequently PhD's. It's serious stuff. One does not get this kind of
understanding by harvesting buzzwords and myths from journalists and
rank amateurs who masquerade pn the web as audio authorities.

>
> And I am still waiting for an answer on what you guys wants to see from
> the HiFi world, since most of what I see here is negative.

Just a little memory jog for the hopelessly deceived - there is such a
thing as audio without the trappings, myths, taboos, and totems of
audio's golden ears.

Unfortunately there is no known way to accurately discuss what these
charlatans do without sounding negative.

One problem is that so many resources and so much money is wasted on
fantasy audio, that it hinders the development of the good stuff. So the
answer to the question of "What do you want to see" has several
dimensions. One answer is that since it is possible to assemble a really
great sounding audio system without spending a dime on high end trash,
simply do so. Hint: you won't get there if you get sidetracked into
taste-testing DACs with sighted, non-evel matched, non-time synched
listening evaluations. Another answer is that it would be refreshing to
see even just new lies and flase claims from Audio's high end. The list
of audio myths and other false claims that has been imported onto this
forum lately is the same-old, same-old, some of it more than two decades
old.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-28 09:52:36 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I apologize for the representatives of the DBT thought police that I
> have stationed near your house to make sure that you don't try to do any
> proper experiments. They are obviously acting in a too heavy handed way
> if you can detect them.;-)

Hah, it's the neural damping field man, turn it down a bit will ya! ;)

> The problem with the experimentation that has been suggested here lately
> is that it is not good useful experimentation that sheds helpful light
> on the issue at hand, but rather merely muddling and playing with audio
> gear and gaining self-gratification from turning the fancy knobs.

Well yes and no, it depends what you want, really. If what you want from
the experience is a few hours playing with gadgets and you aren't being
"led" by a dealer towards something that costs the earth that you can't
really afford then there's not really any harm to it. I've not done many
in-shop demos but when I have it's been self-led. They just set the
gear up in the room and leave me to it with no commentary applied. I'd
admit I bring my own prejudices to the scene, but it's still
entertaining and maybe I make a good decision and maybe I can't tell the
difference but I can rule out stuff I hate operating, or is physically
ugly (yes this matters to most people!).

> Unfortunately there is no known way to accurately discuss what these
> charlatans do without sounding negative.
>
> One problem is that so many resources and so much money is wasted on
> fantasy audio, that it hinders the development of the good stuff. So the
> answer to the question of "What do you want to see" has several
> dimensions. One answer is that since it is possible to assemble a really
> great sounding audio system without spending a dime on high end trash,
> simply do so. Hint: you won't get there if you get sidetracked into
> taste-testing DACs with sighted, non-evel matched, non-time synched
> listening evaluations. Another answer is that it would be refreshing to
> see even just new lies and flase claims from Audio's high end. The list
> of audio myths and other false claims that has been imported onto this
> forum lately is the same-old, same-old, some of it more than two decades
> old.

I pay no attention to smoke and mirrors stuff (I see no point in
"upgrading" HDMI or SPDIF cables once you have one that connects
properly and isn't falling apart, or buying half tennis balls or bits of
rubber for fifty quid to "stabilise" my electronics), but I don't see,
from my point of view as a non-electronic engineer, any way to build a
system without going to a hifi shop and -trying stuff out- then paying a
reasonable amount of money for a product I'm happy with and into which
someone has engineered the type of things I like - sound, features,
power output, etc.. I'm not even on the radar of the "ultra" high end,
though I admit the Naim amp was far more expensive than any component
that I ever thought I would buy and for many people that puts me firmly
in the category of "audiophile"..

So, I justified it to myself as I liked the sound more than I liked the
others ("false claim?". Well, I did.), and because with a built-in
solidly engineered DAC I no longer had to spend any money on sources.
And it's one box, and it's powerful enough that the sound doesn't
degrade at my preferred listening levels as much as others did, so there
we have it. I guess you'd object to the phrase "it was better than..",
but it was plainly better than what I had before and I preferred it to
the other choices I was presented with. So who lost out?

So how do PA systems compare to home audio? I have been underwhelmed by
some, and blown away by others in gigs over the years. Saw Massive
Attack in a local place one time and their PA was just jaw dropping with
the SPL and clarity it could deliver. On the other hand, I saw The Orb
at a local place and the sound engineer failed miserably to keep the
on-stage artists from pushing their output levels into distortion as
they got drunker and drunker. That was horrible by the time it was being
projected at your ears at 105db. That was clearly operator error..


------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-28 14:07:00 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
>
> Well yes and no, it depends what you want, really. If what you want from
> the experience is a few hours playing with gadgets and you aren't being
> "led" by a dealer towards something that costs the earth that you can't
> really afford then there's not really any harm to it.
>

Ignores the fact that an even more powerful salesperson is present in
the room - you, yourself.

Ignores the warning that you have already received that this is at best
a highly misleading procedure, and you've been given the scientific
reasons why.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
ralphpnj
2016-05-28 14:20:16 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Ignores the fact that an even more powerful salesperson is present in
> the room - you, yourself.
>
> Ignores the warning that you have already received that this is at best
> a highly misleading procedure, and you've been given the scientific
> reasons why.

Arny, I believe that this forum is based in the USA and as things now
stand in the USA important things like facts, science and scientific
reasons have been deemed totally worthless. The new American mantra is
"if I believe it then it's true (and I won't let those pesky things like
facts stand in my way)".

And the two areas where this new mantra is most cherished and embraced
are high end audio and politics.



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: LMS 7.9 on dedicated windows 10 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-29 18:16:33 UTC
Permalink
cliveb wrote:
> Are you referring to Peter Belt? Yep, he is a certifiable fruitcake.
>
>
> Now you're on very shaky ground. Are you suggesting that anyone who
> thinks Britain should leave the EU is stupid?
>

When I listen to them speak, they sound a lot like Trump supporters here
in the US.

>
> As a Brit being bombarded with propaganda from both sides, I can assure
> you of this: nobody really knows what will happen if we do leave.
>

What can be said that nobody knows 100% of what will change, but any
number of things that are part and parcel of the Brexit will of course
happen quite assuredly.

>
> It's possible that leaving the EU could be good for Britain. Or not.
> The British public has no actual facts upon which to base their vote -
> only partisan claims on both sides. We are basically being asked to vote
> on what is probably the most important decision for us since WW2 without
> anyone really having a clue.
>

That's a very UK centric-view. Considering the effects of a Brexit on
the rest of the world seems to be beyond many people's mental powers.

There was a point in time when the US could have organized itself like
Europe was - a whole passel of selfish little relatively powerless
independent states. Moving away from that seems to have been a wonderful
idea for us.

I can only guess what would happen if all of the states that I routinely
pass through without fuss or bother were independent states with 100% of
their all their own laws, government, armies, currency, language,
guarded boarders, etc. It would be a gigantic wasteful hassle and for
what? We do have a little of that going on, but it is sharply
attenuated.


>
> On the other hand, perhaps you are suggesting that even allowing an
> uninformed public to vote on the matter is stupid. Problem is, that this
> is how democracy works, and we've yet to find a better system of
> government.
>

That seems to be your own idea, and I'm happy to ignore and let you try
to make sense out of.

>
> Or maybe it's some other aspect of the process that you find stupid - in
> which case please let us know.

My view is that the EU was a good idea as far as it was implemented. The
more the concept of united states you implement in its time, the better.
No need to go backwards to test to see how good of an idea the EU as it
is now was.

Unfortunately, xenophobia seems to be growing in style. Allowing
immigration can solve a lot of problems. Look at Canada.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-30 14:08:22 UTC
Permalink
cliveb wrote:
> Not just the leave campaigners. Both sides are behaving equally badly.
> The remain camp is playing the fear card so much they could well end up
> alienating some of their natural supporters.
>

Is this post sincere or a put on? If sincere it clearly identifies its
creator as being anti-remain. This seems to be consistent with the rest
of the post.

>
> It's gratifying to hear that you know some of the things that will
> definitely happen if Britain leaves the EU.
>

Unlike many I seem some rhyme and reason to human events which enables
some accurate predictions about future events and consequences.

>
> Knowing those things would certainly help me (and others) decide which
> way to vote, so perhaps you would be kind enough to tell us what they
> are?
>


My first observation is that I'm responding to a post from someone who
has probably already made up their mind, and attempting to reason with
them further is probably unproductive.

>
> What works well for the US isn't necessarily what would work well for
> Europe. The two regions' histories are very different.

Right. The US at this time is largely composed of Europeans and their
descendants. Census statistics suggests mostly of a german (small g
denoting germanic as opposed to just citizens of germany) background.
They generally came here because they perceived that the European system
was just not working for them, one way or the other.

I've been in the UK and Europe, even had a permanent residence in
Germany. The countrysides are similar enough to not make a difference
other than the US we have plenty of available real estate (to this day)
which was centuries ago all pretty much all spoken for in the UK and
Europe. The people who stayed behind in Europe were either lacking good
reasoning power or they thought that the European system was working
for them. It was working in its way, but maybe not so much for them.
History shows that about 60 years ago the UK nationalized its major
industries which caused major chaos and loss, and probably did as much
as anything to put UK citizens into German and Japanese cars as
anything. Us old guys can remember when the UK car industry was a major
influence on the world marketplace. We saw a lot of their cars on the
roads over here. Some of us (myself included) even owned some.

My ancestors came to the US around the turn of the 20th century. They
quickly became successful and far more than merely self-sufficient as
farmers, merchants and tradesmen. They watched in wonder and amazement
while Europe hosted two world wars, a number of ruinous and dramatic
political changes (such as the Russian revolution) (my family were White
Russians and many including my paternal grandfather were officers in the
Czar's army until they deserted) and numerous other wasteful adventures.
Can't they just get along? Stalin murdered about 29 million White
Russians in the late 20s and 30s. Good thing we left before then. Waste
on the level that some Europeans seem to favor hurts us all. Always
did.

I see the Brexit as just another one of those adventures, hopefully it
remains on a far smaller scale then the biggies. Next time I go to
Chicago and cross three state lines rather casually each way (small road
signs that you can easily overlook mark the borders), I'll be reminded
of how fond some are of putting up manned, armed checkpoints and other
major roadblocks to travel and commerce every 2-300 miles, not to
mention dramatically changing the language. Full employment for petty
bureaucrats seems to be the goal.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
mlsstl
2016-05-30 14:46:03 UTC
Permalink
Seems like a bad case of thread drift is underway....


------------------------------------------------------------------------
mlsstl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9598
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
cliveb
2016-05-30 17:13:08 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Is this post sincere or a put on? If sincere it clearly identifies its
> creator as being anti-remain. This seems to be consistent with the rest
> of the post.
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. I happen to be (at this time)
strongly in favour of remaining in the EU. But if facts (rather than
propaganda) emerge about what will happen should we leave, I will take
them into consideration before making a final decision.

arnyk wrote:
> Unlike many I seem some rhyme and reason to human events which enables
> some accurate predictions about future events and consequences.
Yes, you already said that. But when invited to enumerate them, you
avoid the question.

arnyk wrote:
> My first observation is that I'm responding to a post from someone who
> has probably already made up their mind, and attempting to reason with
> them further is probably unproductive.
Ducking out of the debate is typical of someone who fears they might
lose face.

Cards on the table time, Arny: I think that you have a problem with
being challenged about anything. All I did was challenge you to back up
a statement that I think was ill-advised, and your reaction has been
true to form.



Transporter -> ATC SCM100A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-30 17:54:52 UTC
Permalink
cliveb wrote:
> You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
>

IOW, it was not sincere, but rather designed to give a false
impression.

No time for that sort of thing, today.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
docbob
2016-05-30 19:02:27 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> If sincere it clearly identifies its creator as being anti-remain.
No, you are jumping to conclusions here. I didn't read it that way at
all. He said both sides are behaving badly.
arnyk wrote:
> IOW, it was not sincere, but rather designed to give a false impression.
You misinterpret, but blame him?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
docbob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64780
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-29 21:24:49 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Its always a struggle to...

Apparently you couldn't read it when I said it the first time so I had
to help you out. I'll write in a larger font next time.

> Perceiving audible differences among good electronics and cables is all
> due to choosing bias and illusion over reliable facts.

So you have said a million times in a million obtuse and patronising
ways. I remain sceptical until I get a chance to properly test out your
hypothesis myself sometime.

I wouldn't start on Brexit. How about 51 states all with different
languages and proud and ancient histories? I think us dropping out would
be lunacy and I know we gain a lot from immigration and emigration, but
it's really nothing like the USA at all and you couldn't possibly
comprehend it if that is your only frame of reference.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
ralphpnj
2016-05-28 13:44:49 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Just a little memory jog for the hopelessly deceived - there is such a
> thing as audio without the trappings, myths, taboos, and totems of
> audio's golden ears.
>
> Unfortunately there is no known way to accurately discuss what these
> charlatans do without sounding negative.
>
> One problem is that so many resources and so much money is wasted on
> fantasy audio, that it hinders the development of the good stuff. So the
> answer to the question of "What do you want to see" has several
> dimensions. One answer is that since it is possible to assemble a really
> great sounding audio system without spending a dime on high end trash,
> simply do so. Hint: you won't get there if you get sidetracked into
> taste-testing DACs with sighted, non-evel matched, non-time synched
> listening evaluations. Another answer is that it would be refreshing to
> see even just new lies and flase claims from Audio's high end. The list
> of audio myths and other false claims that has been imported onto this
> forum lately is the same-old, same-old, some of it more than two decades
> old.

Arny I really do believe that you are onto something. As I write this
response on the Squeezebox forum while listening to music being streamed
onto a Squeezebox Touch I realize that your point about fantasy audio
rings quite true with respect to the high end audio world's flat out
rejection of streaming audio. Oh sure some of you will no doubt point
out all the high end audio manufacturers who have developed and released
various "high end" audio streamers and I will counter that by stating
just how overpriced and absolutely terrible these streamers are.
Overpriced because with many of the one box streamers, incorporating a
hard drive along with a network streamer, the user ends up spending many
orders of magnitude more for a simple hard drive. Add to this the over
reliance in high end streamers on bad network protocols (DNLA and UPnP -
either of which are easy to get to function properly) and the result
ends up being a total embrace of yesterday's technology, i.e. vinyl and
silver discs.

By whatever metric one cares to use computer based digital audio is
vastly superior to disc player based audio and while the consumer audio
world continues to move in this direction, the high end audio world
continues to live in and worship the past. And so through the use of
good old FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) high end audio fights to keep
the old disc player paradigm going when they should be finding ways of
improving the new streaming paradigm.



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: LMS 7.9 on dedicated windows 10 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-29 18:24:34 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> I did enjoy that recent article about how different hard drives in a NAS
> altered the sound of the streamer..

I bet! Its an illusion based on wortheless anti scientific experiments,
unfortunately right down some people's alley.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-29 21:27:42 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I bet! Its an illusion based on wortheless anti scientific experiments,
> unfortunately right down some people's alley.
So glad I didn't use those dull sounding SSDs when I was modelling the
forces on a satellite. I need my bits to be nice and sparkly.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Wombat
2016-05-29 18:59:50 UTC
Permalink
Brexit in the media ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9MFho7Rju4



Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 14:16:57 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> You could prove it easily by using, and I quote, "Level-matched,
> time-synched, bias controlled listening tests".
>
> But that's not going to happen any time soon, is it?
Just like lots of things can be proven with infinite time and patience.
In the meantime I'd like to enjoy my life. :)




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
StephenPG
2016-05-27 14:34:17 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Just like lots of things can be proven with infinite time and patience.
> In the meantime I'd like to enjoy my life. :)


As I can see from your reply to arnyk, always looking for a loophole to
avoid actually testing your hypothesis...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
StephenPG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48249
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 16:08:41 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> As I can see from your reply to arnyk, always looking for a loophole to
> avoid actually testing your hypothesis...

Not "avoid", just don't have contacts who could help me achieve that
locally. Where do you start? Have you done a proper ABX test to see if
you can tell the difference? How did you arrange that? Getting it right
is hard and I don't think you learn anything if it isn't done right. So
it would be a long process, and one which I guess I'm not keen to kick
off right now due to kids and work and everything else. Doesn't mean I
don't have an opinion and that I don't have a right to express an
opinion based on what I have experienced so far.

I ask you in return, what is the nirvana you are looking for? A single
"standard" audio manufacturer and no-one ever asks for something
different? No room for variance, no room for trying things out and
letting people learn for themselves? What exactly is the goal in your
view?

I've said a few things in the last few weeks which were entirely true -
to my perceptions. Some of them may well be wrong in fact, but I didn't
come up and declare myself to be arbiter of the truth, only sharing my
experiences.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Mnyb
2016-05-28 08:03:16 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Not "avoid", just don't have contacts who could help me achieve that
> locally. Where do you start? Have you done a proper ABX test to see if
> you can tell the difference? How did you arrange that? Getting it right
> is hard and I don't think you learn anything if it isn't done right. So
> it would be a long process, and one which I guess I'm not keen to kick
> off right now due to kids and work and everything else. Doesn't mean I
> don't have an opinion and that I don't have a right to express an
> opinion based on what I have experienced so far.
>
> I ask you in return, what is the nirvana you are looking for? A single
> "standard" audio manufacturer and no-one ever asks for something
> different? No room for variance, no room for trying things out and
> letting people learn for themselves? What exactly is the goal in your
> view?
>
> I've said a few things in the last few weeks which were entirely true -
> to my perceptions. Some of them may well be wrong in fact, but I didn't
> come up and declare myself to be arbiter of the truth, only sharing my
> experiences.

Then just accepts what reasonably can be concluded by others that have
done proper ABX .
That line level equipment with flat frequency response 20-20kHz with low
noise and low distortions ,can't be told apart .

Army is sometimes to optimistic :) sadly there is a lot of high end that
actually sounds different but not for a good reason.
The designers can be caught up in some fad themselfs like no no nfb ,
tubes , weird filters , passive IV stage etc .

I'm right out making an assumption , that hifi should be taken at its
original meaning high fidelity . That you want to hear what's on the
CD's or in your music files .

There are another criteria which makes it still valid and important to
choose the rigth equipment .



--------------------------------------------------------------------
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
(spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-06-01 20:49:47 UTC
Permalink
Mnyb wrote:
> Then just accepts what reasonably can be concluded by others that have
> done proper ABX .
> That line level equipment with flat frequency response 20-20kHz with low
> noise and low distortions ,can't be told apart .
>
> Some references:
>
> http://www.mixonline.com/thewire/new-subjective-tests-challenge-claimed-benefits-high-resolution-audio/426946
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQzNPAdF4aI
>
>
> 20553


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: individual high res audio.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=20553|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-06-06 12:47:05 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> Some references:
>
> http://www.mixonline.com/thewire/new-subjective-tests-challenge-claimed-benefits-high-resolution-audio/426946
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQzNPAdF4aI
>

The files that you can download to do your own listening tests can be
downloaded (full set for 3 different tests)
http://www.avsforum.com/uploads/Combined-HRA-Test-Files.zip


There are three sets of files for performing 3 different subjective
tests. The 3 tests cover (1) Dynamic Range Tests, (2) High-Frequency
Tests Using Highpass Filter, and (3) High-Frequency Tests Using Lowpass
Filter.

The dynamic range test presents a 15 sec selection of music at a
reference level that the listener chooses, 15 seconds of the same music
further attenuated by an amount that is characteristic of the specific
test, and another 15 second clip of the same musical selection at the
same reference level as the first selection. The characteristic
attenuations range from 0 dB to 90 dB in logical steps and are
identified in the file name.

One can use these files for ABX testing on their PC using the FUBAR2000
ABX Comparator plugin, which like the FOOBAR2000 music player is a free
download.

The "A" reference file for all dynamic range tests should be the -90 dB
file. Ideally there would be a - infinity file (digital black) (which I
have created for myself), but it is too large to upload.

Select the "B" file from the list of dynamic range files with various
attenuation. Usually one starts with the highest possible dynamic range
and works down. If you can reliably hear a difference between one of
these files and the reference "A" file, then you have shown that you can
reliably hear a difference related to that amount of dynamic range.
Obviously, you can play these files at very high potentially ear
damaging levels and obtain very sensitive results, but the intent is
that you first pick and maintain a comfortable listening level for the
unattenuated segments of the test files.

The reference "A" files for the frequency response tests should be the
files that cover the fullest frequency ranges, such as the "030 kHz
Chime 192 dB per Octave.wav" and the "030 1kHz to 40kHz Chime 192 db
per Octave.wav" files. Again start with the "B" file with the highest
possible frequency range and work down until you reliably hear
differences.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 17:18:24 UTC
Permalink
StephenPG wrote:
> As I can see from your reply to arnyk, always looking for a loophole to
> avoid actually testing your hypothesis...

What I see is a recitation of many of the false claims and pseudoscience
that are commonly used by high end audio journalists and salesman. When
disemboweled by scientific arguments, there is generally no attempt to
overcome the arguments and facts that falsify them.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 17:21:56 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> What I see is a recitation of many of the false claims and pseudoscience
> that are commonly used by high end audio journalists and salesman. When
> disemboweled by scientific arguments, there is generally no attempt to
> overcome the arguments and facts that falsify them.
What claims have I made? Seriously. What, exactly, are you trying to
debunk? That I think I can hear a difference? Is that it?




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 16:14:02 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Just like lots of things can be proven with infinite time and patience.
> In the meantime I'd like to enjoy my life. :)

I'm not sure your previous comments agree with this.

You said:

"Even if you're kidding yourself that it sounds better but you enjoyed
the process, what does it matter? This is an entertainment system after
all not a system of record."

If it is indeed an entertainment system, since it is a primarily
designed to be a system for entertaining yourself by listening to music,
Therefore, the most entertaining thing to do with an audio system is to
use it to listen to music.

Yet, instead you advise frustrating yourself by listening for
(generally non existent) differences among passive components, and the
like.

Once I learned from DBTs that so many different components are sonically
indistinguishable from each other, I invested the time saved to enjoy
music.

If you want to hear differences, the ones that exist as differences in
the sound of different piecea of music are far easier and more enjoyable
to spend time listening to.

Why do something that is inherently frustrating such as listening for
the minor to non-existent differences among passive components, when
simply listening to music is so much easier and so much more
pleasurable?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 17:18:40 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> I'm not sure your previous comments agree with this.
>
> You said:
>
> "Even if you're kidding yourself that it sounds better but you enjoyed
> the process, what does it matter? This is an entertainment system after
> all not a system of record."
>
> If it is indeed an entertainment system, since it is a primarily
> designed to be a system for entertaining yourself by listening to music,
> Therefore, the most entertaining thing to do with an audio system is to
> use it to listen to music.
>
> Yet, instead you advise frustrating yourself by listening for
> (generally non existent) differences among passive components, and the
> like.
>
> Once I learned from DBTs that so many different components are sonically
> indistinguishable from each other, I invested the time saved to enjoy
> music.
>
> If you want to hear differences, the ones that exist as differences in
> the sound of different piecea of music are far easier and more enjoyable
> to spend time listening to.
>
> Why do something that is inherently frustrating such as listening for
> the minor to non-existent differences among passive components, when
> simply listening to music is so much easier and so much more
> pleasurable?

Why.. ? because I actually think going to a shop and playing about with
different HiFi gear is *fun*. Like all new gadgets. That is what I was
getting at. You've been there done that got the t shirt and decided you
can't be bothered with it any more. Fine, so let others make their own
minds up!

I do also enjoy those days when I just sit and listen to music, and
sometimes having new gear is a good excuse to listen to old favourites
again. This is all part of the fun!

Back to my other question. Should we strive towards a single choice of
sound system or is there room for variance?




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-27 17:50:04 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> Why.. ? because I actually think going to a shop and playing about with
> different HiFi gear is *fun*.
>

I have to admit that I outgrew that sort of thing before I became 35. I
obviously thought it was fun before that because I used to visit audio
shops all over the world.

>
> Like all new gadgets.
>

Having children and a good career meant that I had more complex and
challenging (IOW more fun) things to do.

>
> That is what I was getting at. You've been there done that got the t
> shirt and decided you can't be bothered with it any more. Fine, so let
> others make their own minds up!
>

You have told the members of this forum to ignore what everybody but you
has to say. I think that may be a sign of megalomania.

For the record, I think that every thing I post should be compared to
the relevant findings of science, and if it does not conform, it should
be pointed out and let's find a better answer. Believe it at your own
risk!

As has been pointed out, some things that some people post here are so
irrelevant to findings of science, and their authors are so certain of
their infallibility that responding to them is a waste of time.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-27 18:14:37 UTC
Permalink
arnyk wrote:
> For the record, I think that every thing I post should be compared to
> the relevant findings of science, and if it does not conform, it should
> be pointed out and let's find a better answer. Believe it at your own
> risk!

Glad to hear it. Note that not everyone takes this hobby quite so
seriously as you seem to.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
sckramer
2016-05-12 03:42:41 UTC
Permalink
Archimago wrote:
> Hey Sckramer, cool man! A single chip version :-). I guess ya gotta save
> on the power usage with batteries.
>
> Well, I do have a 4-chip TDA1543 I measured awhile back (bought for $60
> on eBay):
> http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2013/02/measurements-muse-mini-tda1543x4-nos.html
>
> I'm not a fan of the NOS sound. I think some folks like them for
> sounding "pleasant" with the dip in high frequency response. There's
> also the issue of aliasing distortion. I'm tempted to check out the
> filter characteristics of that DAC again since those measurements were
> made many years back. These old chips are supposedly of poor linearity
> hence the use in multiple parallel configuration to improve accuracy of
> the conversion.

Hmmm, maybe the single chip version has a very specific sound that
sounds "vintage" -- so a nostalgia thing for people, dunno :D



'AudioSystem' (http://bit.ly/1ruj0Zw) - 'YouTube'
(http://bit.ly/1ULq4fT) - 'Twitter' (http://bit.ly/1q8dTgc)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
sckramer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20311
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-12 07:25:42 UTC
Permalink
sckramer wrote:
> Hmmm, maybe the single chip version has a very specific sound that
> sounds "vintage" -- so a nostalgia thing for people, dunno :D
I think there's a great deal of nostalgia in HiFi. And I wonder if there
will be another vinyl revival when the pre-CD-buying generation finally
dies off.

The Arcam certainly had a more weighty sound than the other CD players
around at the time, which is possibly one of the reasons it was popular,
but i found it less adept at complex mixes. It was decades ago though..
sold it on eventually.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Julf
2016-05-12 07:58:50 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> I think there's a great deal of nostalgia in HiFi. And I wonder if there
> will be another vinyl revival when the pre-CD-buying generation finally
> dies off.

I understand that the cool hipsters have moved on to cassette tapes.



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
arnyk
2016-05-11 10:11:46 UTC
Permalink
garym wrote:
> is it even possible to find a 16 bit DAC anymore?????
>

For example they can be found in some portable players. When power usage
is an issue, why waste it on useless hardware?

Furthermore, a lot of so-called 24 bit DACs perform like they are 16 (or
fewer) bit DACs front-ended with a sample length converter. This can be
done with either hardware or in the device driver software. Since the
alleged benefits of > 16 bit DACs are generally not audible, its not
like some audiophile is going to hear anything but an imaginary
difference, anyway.

>
> and even when playing 16/44.1 content, having 24 bit can be good because
> of the volume control that may be done in the digital domain and can use
> some of those extra 8 bits.

You don't need extra bits to make a good digital volume control.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
drmatt
2016-05-12 08:00:34 UTC
Permalink
I had a lot of those too.. but wouldn't go back.. they were pretty bad.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Julf
2016-05-12 12:18:03 UTC
Permalink
drmatt wrote:
> I had a lot of those too.. but wouldn't go back.. they were pretty bad.

I guess that is precisely why the hipsters like them :)



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...